Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/14/2010 9:26:22 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
Shhhhh..... this is contra to what "Everyone Knows".

Also contra is that Brockovich more-or-less wrecked her own family in the process. She's far from a heroine.

But don't say that. "Everyone knows" different.

2 posted on 12/14/2010 9:29:10 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

whoops!


3 posted on 12/14/2010 9:29:42 AM PST by Larry381
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Never cared for the looks of that gal.


4 posted on 12/14/2010 9:29:55 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The eco-thugs will not be happy about this.
6 posted on 12/14/2010 9:31:02 AM PST by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
A skank playing a skank about a scam. Never fooled me.....
7 posted on 12/14/2010 9:32:54 AM PST by Niteranger68 (I am in the party of "HELL NO"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
about residents (including an eight-year old dog) who claim PG&E-related ailments.

The real story is that the release of a toxic plume may be responsible for the evolution of a dog who can communicate his thought regarding his medical ailments.

8 posted on 12/14/2010 9:32:54 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Wearing clothes that are 3 sizes too small must affect the circulation to your brain (or something).

9 posted on 12/14/2010 9:33:39 AM PST by smokingfrog (But what do I know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh, dear. I guess I must have missed seeing that movie.


10 posted on 12/14/2010 9:36:52 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The cleanup was something that the company should have been doing without prodding, however, the cancer claims and potential clustering of cases were contrived in the minds of the ambulance-chasing weasels.


11 posted on 12/14/2010 9:36:53 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It doesn’t matter. Being held accountable for their lies is never going to happen. The democratic party lied and minipulated the population for years through the scam of “Global Warming”. It is a lie and they used it purposefully to further their agenda. They are all guilty of fraud, they have no credibility on any issue and can only be trusted to lie at every opportunity.

Not a word about it.


14 posted on 12/14/2010 9:39:30 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
hexavalent chromium 6

Notice from the article that it was diluted in a solution of deadly dihydrogen monoxide (DHMO)! I think we should go after the real culprit: DHMO. Find out who was responsible for introducing DHMO into the hexavalent chromium 6.

16 posted on 12/14/2010 9:43:14 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Pacific Gas and Electric, which released a toxic plume of hexavalent chromium 6 from a Hinkley-based natural gas pipeline station

What is this thing that the writer keeps saying, "hexavalent chromium 6"? If it isn't just redundancy, it looks like somebody is confused about the naming of nuclear isotopes.

Of course, maybe it's that way in the movie. Not that I'm gonna trouble myself to find out.

25 posted on 12/14/2010 9:49:24 AM PST by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Does this mean that PG&E can get their money back?


28 posted on 12/14/2010 9:51:30 AM PST by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh, what a surprise. Hollyweird having NO IDEA what it is talking about AGAIN!


30 posted on 12/14/2010 9:55:11 AM PST by CWCoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Gee, say it ain’t so. Another liberal lie in a movie script.


35 posted on 12/14/2010 10:14:30 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Whether corruption is in politics, science, education, research, etc., always follow the money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Another phony, Leftist heroine, exposed. I'm sure there is a long list of these kinds of people out there. The Dems have been looting this country for decades, now.
37 posted on 12/14/2010 10:30:08 AM PST by Major Matt Mason (Looking forward to kicking Chicago out of Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Erin Brockovich and Rachel Carson, two peas in a pod.


47 posted on 12/14/2010 11:42:46 AM PST by bkopto ("I like being President. And it turns out I'm pretty good at it." Barack Obama, February 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

reported in the Wall Street Journal, “no one agent could possibly have caused more than a handful of the symptoms described, and Chromium 6 in the water almost certainly couldn’t have caused any of them.”

found that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s own risk information concluded that “no data were located in the available literature that suggested that (Chromium 6) is carcinogenic by the oral route of exposure.” The substance has been shown to cause cancer only through inhalation of large doses over many years. High-dose tests in rodents and dogs failed to demonstrate ill effects.

recent research on Chromium 6 exposure at the Hinkley plant showed that “not only was there no excess of cancer when compared to the general California population, but that the overall PG&E worker death rate was significantly much lower than those of other Californians

In the only other skeptical piece about Erin Brockovich to appear in a major mainstream newspaper, New York Times science reporter Gina Kolata noted this week that “federal agencies whose scientists were not involved in the litigation said evidence was lacking that chromium (VI) in groundwater caused a myriad of health problems.”

Read the original Wall Street Journal article, “Erin Brockovich, Exposed” and longer version of the article, “The Dark Side of Erin Brockovich” (The National Post, March 29, 2000).

http://fumento.com/brockovich/erinwsj.html

http://fumento.com/brockovich/erinpost.html


52 posted on 12/14/2010 12:24:44 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Feb 4th 2009 9:00AM

Elizabeth Brockovich, 17, daughter of environmental campaigner Erin Brockovich recently spoke out about her addiction to drugs — and blames her mom’s fame for her struggles.

Elizabeth confessed that she started experimenting with marijuana at age 12, and was hooked on cocaine and prescription drugs by age 14, all while her mother was busy campaigning or promoting her hit Hollywood film, Erin Brockovich, starring Julia Roberts.

http://www.parentdish.com/2009/02/04/erin-brockovich-daughter-blames-mom-for-addiction/

“When the movie came out, she was gone all the time either on appearances or interviews or lecturing,” said Elizabeth. “That was my time to go crazy, because she wasn’t there. I would ditch school, I was driving around with kids that were under the influence.

“Brockovich, 48, says she didn’t know Elizabeth was using drugs. It was only when her daughter’s grades started slipping and “she’d no longer look in my eyes,” that Brockovich realized her daughter was using. That, and the money Elizabeth was stealing from her to pay for her habit.


57 posted on 12/14/2010 12:51:50 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Erin married actor Eric Ellis in 1999.

Erin’s 1999 marriage was her third trip to the alter. She was first married in 1982 to a restaurant manager named Shawn Brown, with whom she had two children, Matthew and Katie. Erin and Shawn divorced in 1987.

After becoming a secretary at a Reno brokerage, it was there that she met her third husband, stockbroker Steven Brockovich. The two married in 1989 and had one child, her youngest daughter, Elizabeth. Erin and Steven divorced in 1990.

Currently, Erin Brockovich-Ellis lives with her husband and children in Agoura Hills, California.

In addition to dyslexia, Erin also claims that she has struggled through anorexia and that she has panic disorder.

Joe Schwarcz, director of McGill University’s Office for Chemistry and Society, “is that ingested chromium-6 encounters hydrochloric acid in the stomach’s gastric juices, and is converted to chromium-3, which is innocuous.” Chromium-3 is a trace mineral and is found in such foods as broccoli, cheese, meats, cereal, brewer’s yeast, whole grains, and mushrooms (ETC.org). Chromium-3 is considered essential in man and animals for efficient lipid, glucose, and protein metabolism (GreatDreams.com). Schwarcz also pointed out, “no single toxin causes the wide array of conditions that afflict Hinkley residents.”

The real Erin Brockovich appeared as a waitress in the film.

http://media.nowpublic.net/images/d5/4/d54d99f268cb926fa70b2ee2bf55c5ba.jpg

Erin Brockovich & husband Eric Ellis in Sydney
March 8, 2007


59 posted on 12/14/2010 1:05:37 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson