The Post & Email has already documented that her statement of 50 e-mail inquiries/month seeking access to Obama’s BC is dead wrong. Can you say “perjury”? That instance is already documented. Does anybody do anything about it? Not even in this certifiably documented instance of perjury.
So tell me exactly why I should believe what Fukino said in this statement when it’s already proven to be perjury.
And tell me what you think of the credibility of somebody who has documentably perjured herself like that, in full public view.
The problem is that by now they know the law means nothing. They have already ignored and broken their own laws on disclosure, so what’s a little perjury? Lawlessness. Anarchy. Chaos. Betrayal. Oppression. Chains.
Oh, well, The Post & Email said it. That obviously settles everything, since we all know that the Post & Email outranks the U.S. Supreme Court and speaks with all of the authority of Jesus, Moses and Buddha.
Can you say “perjury”?
Speaking as a lawyer who has defended people indicted for perjury in federal court, I can say "perjury," but I know that it's not always easy to prove. But, on the other hand, if a foreign blog says it, that is obviously incontrovertible proof. Not.