“If she was correctly applying military law then she should have referenced ii under the elements of lawfulness for Article 90”
How do you know that this is correct?
Have you tested this idea?
I’m testing it with the Iran scenario. When I change the destination of the deployment order to Iran and plug it into Lind’s handy-dandy “Turbo Tax Program” I come out with it being totally irrelevant whether a valid President has approved the use of force in Iran.
So you tell me. Do you think her handy-dandy program does the processing right?