Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

Dead wrong. Thus far judges have all ruled that nobody who has filed has standing to even get the issue on the table.

Please don’t continue to claim that any judge has actually ruled on the actual eligibility of Barack Obama.

And the evidence that you mentioned is flawed because

1) Hawaii officials have not and CAN NOT say that Obama was born in Hawaii, because what they have for Obama - per their own statutory admission - is amended and has no probative value unless and until it is presented as evidence, which Obama will not allow to be done.

Furthermore, Hawaii officials have hid rules and disobeyed rules and laws on Obama’s behalf, so calling them the “loyal opposition” is disingenuous. “Partners in crime” would be much more accurate.

2) The birth announcements are fake. The microfilms were changed out in the libraries.

3) Kapiolani Hospital says they can’t say whether Obama was born there. Obama has signed a statement with raised seal saying he was born there but won’t tell anybody whether it is genuine or a forgery by Abercrombie.


742 posted on 12/15/2010 12:43:45 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

“The microfilms were changed out in the libraries.”
__

OK, game over. butterdezillion is revealed as an obot troll.

No one — and I mean no one — is dumb enough to believe that.


746 posted on 12/15/2010 12:48:15 PM PST by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion
2) The birth announcements are fake. The microfilms were changed out in the libraries.

Oh my goodness. You really believe that? Seriously?

762 posted on 12/15/2010 1:11:01 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

Dead wrong. Thus far judges have all ruled that nobody who has filed has standing to even get the issue on the table.

Please don’t continue to claim that any judge has actually ruled on the actual eligibility of Barack Obama.

And the evidence that you mentioned is flawed because

1) Hawaii officials have not and CAN NOT say that Obama was born in Hawaii, because what they have for Obama - per their own statutory admission - is amended and has no probative value unless and until it is presented as evidence, which Obama will not allow to be done.

Furthermore, Hawaii officials have hid rules and disobeyed rules and laws on Obama’s behalf, so calling them the “loyal opposition” is disingenuous. “Partners in crime” would be much more accurate.

2) The birth announcements are fake. The microfilms were changed out in the libraries.

3) Kapiolani Hospital says they can’t say whether Obama was born there. Obama has signed a statement with raised seal saying he was born there but won’t tell anybody whether it is genuine or a forgery by Abercrombie.


There are no issues of standing if the criminal justice side of the judicial system is utilized as opposed to the civil side. No president has EVER been bothered in his term of office by a lawsuit anyway.

Every serious investigation of presidential actions has been conducted via Grand Jury: Watergate, Iran-Contra, Savings and Loan Scandal, Whitewater, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, CIA Leaks/Valerie Plame are just a few examples.

All of the allegations made above about Obama’s documents can be investigated by a Grand Jury with subpoena power over the release of documents and witnesses being compelled to testify under oath.


792 posted on 12/15/2010 2:34:25 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson