Desertion is a capital offence period
That does not mean everyone that deserts is executed, only that they can be punished to that extent by a court martial.
Again I am reminded of the saying that Rules and Regulations are at the discretion of the commander.
The court denied him the right to prove Obama is not eligible by denying him the right to access what should be a public document. Every one of us has at one time or another had to prove who we are by showing our original birth certificates.
In Florida even that is not enough to get an official Identification card much less a driver’s license, but yet in Obama’s case we are lead to believe that an abstract certification only physically examined by two Obama supporters and posted on the internet is enough to qualify him for the highest position in our government and unquestionable command over our military.
Desertion is Article 85, not 87 (Missing movement)/92 (Failure to obey order or regulation).
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30404861/Court-Martial-Charges-Against-Lt-Col-Terrance-Lakin
In Florida even that is not enough to get an official Identification card much less a driver’s license,
__________________________
My wife just got hers renewed. She had to have a long form BC, SS card, 2 bills showing her name and address, marriage license to show name change from the one her birth certificate. One of the bills didn’t have the right info on it so she also had to show voters registration card and another photo ID..... Thanks to Bush’s law. I guess it’s good to bust illegals but they will just drive without a license and hope they don’t get caught. Now her driver’s license isn’t just info within the state, it’s in a national data base. Big brother and all that good stuff.
Just a FReindly warning, when you go in combat with ms. WKA, your head will soon be spinning in unbelief!!!
And it’s even worse than just denying him access to the records. Lind actually said that Obama’s qualifications are IRRELEVANT. By Hawaii law, any person is supposed to be able to ask to see Obama’s records at this point and the HDOH HAS to disclose it because Fukino made a public announcement about what is on his “vital records”.
If Lakin wanted, and the Hawaii courts would follow the rule of law (I know, less likely than pigs flying but I have to say it anyway), he could have the proof of what the HDOH has already indirectly admitted: that they have no legally valid BC for Obama, because Obama’s BC has been amended.
But even if Lakin had absolute proof that Obama was an ineligible fraud, Lind would not allow the evidence to be admitted because she ruled that it is IRRELEVANT.
The authorization for the troop surge absolutely depended legally (according to SJ Res 23) on being given by “the President”, and Article 92(1) says that orders contrary to the Constitution are not lawful. Yet proof that Joe Biden is the only person the Constitution allows to “act as President” would be IRRELEVANT to Lakin’s charges.
Unbelievable. I’m shaking my head in disbelief at this.