AP is dead wrong on this though. Hawaii officials CANNOT say they have records proving where Obama was born, because the BC that Hawaii has is not legally valid. The State itself is forbidden to say what the facts of Obama’s birth are, because they have no records that they trust to be accurate - according to HRS 338-17.
The word that Fukino used was “verifying”. She has seen the vital records VERIFYING that Obama was born in HI. The word “verify” means to swear. There is a record in Hawaii swearing that Obama was born in Hawaii. To PROVE is something totally different, though it’s understandable that the AP would make this mistake. They should correct it though.
" The word that Fukino used was “verifying”. She has seen the vital records VERIFYING that Obama was born in HI. The word “verify” means to swear. There is a record in Hawaii swearing that Obama was born in Hawaii. To PROVE is something totally different, though it’s understandable that the AP would make this mistake. They should correct it though. "
The only thing that they can only " verify " is that they have some kind of documents on Obama and his birth documents.
They may say that he was born in Hawaii, but, have not yet proved it to the public ( a COLB does not count, and the one shown on the Factcheck.com web page is fake )
One thing people, or the Obots keep refusing to consider, or chose to ignore is ? there is a article from a former CIA agent called ( Clearing the smoke of Obama's eligibility ) ... link:
Clearing the Smoke on Obama's eligibility If the Obots and anti-birther were to take the time to read it, that ? yes indeed, there were some provisions in the laws at the time Obama was to suppose to have been born in Hawaii for out of state births and out of this country births to be registered as a Hawaiian birth ( in other words, to appear as a legitimate Hawaiian birth, though it was in fact not a Hawaiian birth )....
Come on Obots, anti-birthers, we challenge you to read that article, perhaps it will open your blinded eyes.