Can you back this statement up, or is it just more Paul-bashing?
Isn't this just another take on the "racist newsletter monthly" that was used to smear him during the 2008 primaries, and later shown to be untrue?
“Isn’t this just another take on the “racist newsletter monthly” that was used to smear him during the 2008 primaries, and later shown to be untrue?”
They weren’t “shown to be untrue.”
The best Paul came up with was admitting it was anti-semetic garbage in his newsletters for years-and-years, but claiming he didn’t write the newsletter that went out under his name, nor read it.
Sorry, one article, maybe. Years and years of anti-semetic tripe? No excuse.
And, yes, I have confirmed by reading the newsletters myself.
In a vacuum? Maybe.
Coupled with the fact that Paul is also a non-interventionist-of-convenience (only when it harms Israel), it’s apparent what Paul is.
Paul is a slightly-more-subtle version of his friend David Duke.