You know what I mean, but I’ll rephrase more precisely so you can’t wiggle free.
Wouldn’t it be a bit of a conspiracy for the government to launch a missile off the coast of L.A. in full view of the public and then to not acknowledge it? Wouldn’t the government be conspiring to keep the public in the dark?
I was accused of accusing other posters of being conspirators. How is it "wiggling free" to say that your straw man about something entirely different doesn't apply? It's a non-sequitur. How is it "wiggling free" to say that I never made that contention? Either the facts fit your accusation or they don't and they clearly don't.