VIDEO: Christine O'Donnell analyzes and explains her own Senate race in Delaware in speech

Northern Virginia Tea Party, 2nd Annual Banquet ^ | December 7, 2010 | Christine O'Donnell

[Moseley]

With all of the debate about the 2010 US Senate race in Delaware, the candidate herself, Christine O'Donnell, provided her own analysis of her own US Senate race in 2010.

The video of O'Donnell's analysis is available for viewing on-line at:

http://www.DelawareNewsCenter.com/ODonnellAnalyzesSenateRace.wmv

Christine O'Donnell addressed questions about whether the tea party got behind flawed candidates, and attempts to discredit the tea party generally.

The following excerpt (5 minutes) is from Christine O'Donnell's speech to the Second Annual Banquet of the Northern Virginia Tea Party on December 7.

http://www.DelawareNewsCenter.com/ODonnellAnalyzesSenateRace.wmv

Christine O'Donnell drew an overflow crowd of 250 guests, the maximum number the restaurant could handle in the ballroom as configured.

Originally, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli was scheduled months ago, but had to cancel on November 18 due to a conflict with his official duties and responsibilities. Christine O'Donnell agreed to cover for Ken Cuccinelli as a personal favor to her 2008 primary campaign manager Jon Moseley and Northern Virginia Tea Party founder Ron Wilcox, a long-time conservative activist who has networked with O'Donnell on issues over the years.

[Vendome]

Didn’t know that Momma’s boy had a first name. LOL

[Palladin]

Laz and Christine?

Oh, no! I must get that image out of my head!

[Moseley]

SORRY YOU LOSE:

Here is what Christine O’Donnell said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR9nojmjOrM

TRANSCRIPT
QUOTE:
“The reason I say this is a tragedy is because his announcement today for economic recovery is more of a potpourri of sound bytes. It’s like he took a little bit of what each party wanted and put it together. It’s not constructive, it’s not a solid plan constructed on sound economic principles.”

“He is taking piecemeal parts of the full plan — which you could say is cut squared — tax cuts and spending cuts. So it’s not going to work. He’s going to say, see I catered to the Republicans but it didn’t work. It didn’t work because your plan is a result of the spin-doctors’ chop shop. FRANKENOMICS if you will. You know, I mean Frankenstein, not Franken the comedian turned Senator, although both are applicable here.”

“But what Barack Obama is doing — by doing this piecemeal of potpouri of sound bites, instead of implementing a solid, well- thought out economic plan for recovery based on free-market principles — what he is doing is not only collapsing our nation economically but he’s weakening our collective character as a whole. He is weakening the collective character that defines us as a country, that defines us Americans.”
UNQUOTE

O’Donnell later explained further that Obama and the Congress needed to cut spending in order to pay for the extension of unemployment benefits:

“If we’re going to extend the jobless benefits we have got to cut spending programs and that’s the flaw in his announcement,” O’Donnell said. “That’s the tragedy.”

[Vendome]

Tell you what. I finally figured out who you are and you are so crazy that unfortunately for Christine, if you are involved in her future campaigns, I will support whoever the opposition is and that includes Coons.

We can’t afford to have people like you who would flat out lie, in direct contravention to the facts, as part of a representatives team.

Sorry Christine, I am changing my tune on you from now on and will openly mock you and work against you.

Too bad, I truly did not like Mike Castle having met him twice and a few other relatives of his.

[Vendome]

Hey, thanks for telling me who this weirdo is. I did some quick research and whoo boy!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2640049/posts?page=46#46

[Moseley]

Vendome, you are the liar, so everything you write applies to you.

You lied. I caught you lying. I proved you lying.

So no wonder you’re pissed.

You finally figured out who I am???? I am using my real name, nitwit! I have been very open about who I am. I have been completely honest and open about who I am.

Try this: I described who I am and my relationship with Christine O’Donnell in front of 300 people last Tuesday.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJYjGAGPZHc

And you play this pathetic “seminar caller” trick of “I just figured out who you are.” I HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE WHO I AM FOR MONTHS.

So you figured it out only because I TOLD YOU.

Your post is a LAUGHABLE, desperate variation on the “SEMINAR CALLER” tactic.

You were already mocking Christine from the very start.

You are such a pathetic liberal that you instinctiely throw out the “I USED TO BE A SUPPORTER, BUT THIS IS THE LAST STRAW” GAMBIT even when it doesn’t work.

You were ALWAYS attacking Christine O’Donnell.

But now you have lost all credibility when you do it.

[Moseley]

Vendome, to be a “seminar caller” you need to go back and take the seminar again.

Whichever liberal seminar you went to, you were not paying attention. You are not playing the game very well.

[Moseley]

You know darn well what “The Hill” reported yesterday if you are such an ardent fan and that is what I based my comment on.

So you are pretending to be a conservatie, who actually believes that what the news media writes is true?

HA! Hilarious! No conservative would believe that what the news media writes is automatically true.

[Vendome]

No seminar trick. I actually thought your screen name was that “a screen name”.

Didn’t know it was your actual last name.

You proved zip except that you might be emotionally unstable, at least that’s the way I see and I am an untrained professional.

You didn’t tell me who you were, Palladin did.

Until day before yesterday I had openly and fervently said nothing had nothing but glowing remarks for Christine. One because she is hot and two because I use to live in DE and it holds a special place in my heart.

I met Mike Castle and some of his relatives before and found them pretty rude, hence my support for Christine.

Besides, she was a more sensible choice for me over the other candidates. Mike has proven himself to be the snake I thought he was with his vote for the DREAM act. FUMC

Anway, nice to spar with you but I am going to oppose Christine from now on.

And you’re right, I am a liberal. Can’t understand why JR and other posters don’t vote to ZOT me but I guess they need the fun, so they keep me around like a pet or mascot or excuse.

Later.

[Moseley]

In fact, Vendome, the very existence of FREE REPUBLIC is based on the fact that CONSERVATIVES DON'T TRUST THE LIBERAL NEWS MEDIA.

So you are arguing if it is in The Hill therefore it must be true?

And you said Christine said something bad about Elizabeth Edwards. You did not have a clue what the controversy was about. All you know is it was on the action list for liberal seminar callers to try to do something about it.

Go back and take the liberal seminar again.

[Vendome]

Oops, didn’t see had a second post.

No, I didn’t actually believe my lying eyes when the Hill reported it. Someone else called me from VA who I guess was at your meeting to alert me and it was confirmed by the video.

So I guess I was taken in by all that evidence and got suckered.

Wasn’t the first time probably won’t be the last.

[Moseley]

Vendome, Free Republic enables one to search by screen name.

You are lying when you say you have been saying "nothing but glowing remarks" for CHristine. Bull.

Typical seminar caller: Step 1: Pretend to be a supporter. (Dead giveaway is caller doesn't know what the show or thread is really about). Step 2: Say BUT THIS one thing has changed my mind. Step 3: I will never support you again (NEVER DID, of course).

You started out claiming that you could no longer support Christine because Christine said something rude about Elizabeh Edwards.

Christine praised Elizabeth Edwards and asked for people to PRAY for the family of "this fine woman."

You have no idea what the topic was about. You claim that you can no longer support Christine based on something you know nothing about. You were clueless what Christine said about Elizabeth Edwards.

You simply saw the action list from the liberal hit squad, and you did not do it very well. You tried to do your part for the liberal team, and you did it badly.

No one who supported Christine would say they no longer support her because of what she said about Elizabeth Edwards, when Christine PRAISED Elizabeth Edwards, MOURNED her death, and asked for PRAYERS for the Edwards family.

You are a fake. You are a seminar caller. If you were a support of Christine you would want to know what she actually said before reacting to it.

[Moseley]

it was confirmed by the video.

It is *NOT* confirmed by the video. The video clearly rejects it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR9nojmjOrM And no, no one from Virginia at the event would call you to tell you bad things about Christine.

What is their name? I can look them up on the seating chart. We have the records of who was there. Give me a name.

Again, I am using my real name.

[Vendome]

That’s you!? LOL

OMG!

I am laughing my liberal azz off.

Puhlease!

[Vendome]

Not interested in telling you but you might meet me one day. Friends don’t usually call in hushed tones only to have themselves revealed and become a target.

And, yes, yes, yes. I get it. You are Jonathan Moseley or something like that.

[Vendome]

Dude you are dumber than a tree stump but hey if you want to post into the wee hours I am free till about 4 or 5am your time.

So you uncovered the secret door of Free Republic. Then your wisdom, show me my first negative comment about Christine.

You won’t search because it will take forever(I post a lot) and until the day before yesterday I never said a thing negative or that could be infered negative until day before yesterday.

Thankfully, for you I am terribly bored this evening and could use a good tete’.

What are you trying to do anyway “paper over my remarks” and bury them somehow? Fine by me Goebbels.

So here is what Christinne said and for the life of me I don’t know why I am repeating myself to a lunatic who apparently howls at brick walls.

Buuuuut....

“Tragedy comes in threes,” O’Donnell said. “Pearl Harbor, Elizabeth Edwards’s passing and Barack Obama’s announcement of extending the tax cuts, which is good, but also extending the unemployment benefits.”

The above statement can be found on video recorded at your event or whoever’s event and following are videos demonstrating unequivocally her use of the exact words above:

remarks at the 2:15 mark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJhC0o3B0Zk
Posted by GlenSColen at Youtube

Here is the offending remark as seen on Anderson Cooper
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioeiIjCQcbA
Posted by SuchIsLifeVideos at Youtube

And again here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEbD82B0X-A
Posted by PresidentObama3

Again, Yawn remarks at the 1:50 mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc2-u_85_jg
Posted by claymore4freedom at Youtube

My my my again right at the beginning of the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReyeEtXXKgg
Posted by ericarhendry at Youtube

You can say it ain’t true all you want and you are entitled to whatever synthetic narrative you want.

You are however divorced from reality and that’s a fact Jack.

If you were a real campaign manager, you would have explained away the comment and moved on.

But you are not a campaign manager so maybe you just aren’t skilled in verbal Judo.

And that’s okay.

[Vendome]

I didn’t say I “could” no longer support Christine.

I did say I “would” no longer support Christine.

Hell if you represent her team then there is simply no reason to support her.

You are obviously incompetent.