VIDEO: Christine O'Donnell analyzes and explains her own Senate race in Delaware in speech

Northern Virginia Tea Party, 2nd Annual Banquet ^ | December 7, 2010 | Christine O'Donnell

[Moseley]

With all of the debate about the 2010 US Senate race in Delaware, the candidate herself, Christine O'Donnell, provided her own analysis of her own US Senate race in 2010.

The video of O'Donnell's analysis is available for viewing on-line at:

http://www.DelawareNewsCenter.com/ODonnellAnalyzesSenateRace.wmv

Christine O'Donnell addressed questions about whether the tea party got behind flawed candidates, and attempts to discredit the tea party generally.

The following excerpt (5 minutes) is from Christine O'Donnell's speech to the Second Annual Banquet of the Northern Virginia Tea Party on December 7.

http://www.DelawareNewsCenter.com/ODonnellAnalyzesSenateRace.wmv

Christine O'Donnell drew an overflow crowd of 250 guests, the maximum number the restaurant could handle in the ballroom as configured.

Originally, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli was scheduled months ago, but had to cancel on November 18 due to a conflict with his official duties and responsibilities. Christine O'Donnell agreed to cover for Ken Cuccinelli as a personal favor to her 2008 primary campaign manager Jon Moseley and Northern Virginia Tea Party founder Ron Wilcox, a long-time conservative activist who has networked with O'Donnell on issues over the years.

[Moseley]

I did indeed know what it was and you did as well.

No, you did not: You said:

Yeah, after what she said yesterday about Elizabeth Edwards I ain’t to keen on her no more.

What Christine said about Elizabeth Edwards is:

QUOTE:

Right before we got here, I don't know if you heard it on the news, Elizabeth Edwards passed away. So if we could just remember that family in your prayers. She was a fine woman. And so just have to take an opportunity, just to remember to pray for that family as they are mourning her loss.

UNQUOTE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So that would make you not support her? You wanted Elizabeth Edwards to die?

[Moseley]

Logic how a candidate who outspent her opponent 2:1 and lost by 16% is ACTUALLY a highly electable candidate and should be a leader?

16% is not a lot, because a swing of 8% would erase that.

Delaware has 110,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans, genius. The Democrat Party increased voter registration by 11% of its total base from 2008 to 2010 -- BEFORE the GOP primary. Mike Castle was expected to be the nominee.

Christine O'Donnell has run in the toughest races in the toughest places. Other candidates are wimps.

She lost because the GOP was divided and attacked its own candidate.

Watch the video and see for yourself. Did you watch her analysis of the race in the video? Or did you just spout off nonsense without knowing what you are talking about?

[Palladin]

You are so bogus.

[Moseley]

Here try this instead:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wot1i9XG7A4

[allmendream]

A 16% loss is not a lot? LOL!!!! Sure sure, keep telling yourself that!

She lost because she is a low rent moron who, in addition to misrepresentations of her academic accomplishments, couldn't correctly identify the 17th or 14th amendments to the Constitution, the document she said was her guiding light.

Kudos to her for saying it, but she certainly couldn't WALK the WALK, she could only TALK the TALK.

The more she becomes the face of the GOP or the Tea Party, the more the interests of the far left will be served. They don't put her on TV because they think she helps us.

[Moseley]

You don’t know much about elections, do you? If you swing 8% of the vote from a 16% difference, YOU WIN. Never been around any elections, have you?

Christine was the Republican nominee for US Senate in 2008.

The last candidate for US Senate not CHristine lost 29% to 70% — a 41% loss !

So you really don’t know what you are talking about.

Christine never misrepresented anything.

However, you are misrepresenting the facts.

In the debate at Widener, Christine instantly recognized the 17th Amendment and discussed it in depth without prompting.

SHe asked for a reminder of which the numbers referred to for the 16th and 14th.

After a 1 word reminder, Christine then discussed - from memory — the details and substance of those amendments without looking at thiem.

She asked Chris Coons to name the 5 freedoms guaranateed by the First Amendment.

COONS REFUSED, BECAUSE HE COULDN’T.

Christine knew the US Constitution. You don’t and Coons didn’t.

[allmendream]

Reagan's victory in 1988 was an 18% difference, and was considered an absolute popular vote LANDSLIDE.

A 16% difference, after outspending your opponent 2:1 is an absolute BEAT DOWN, moreover it is indicative that NO MATTER HOW MUCH she spent, she was not going to “swing” those votes.

I mean just how much would she have to outspend an opponent if 2:1 only got her within 16%?

Are you part of her inept campaigns of feckless self-promotion and loosing candidacy?

[Palladin]

So that is what Jonathon Moseley, Christine O’Donnell’s perpetual campaign manager, looks like.

;)

[Vendome]

Well after she met Laz she probably hasn’t been the same.

Just a guess though.