Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Water board appointments ....
Sac Bee ^ | 12-08-2010 | Matt Weiser

Posted on 12/08/2010 9:15:36 PM PST by Amerigomag

The 11th-hour appointment on Tuesday of two new state water board members dramatically changes the stakes for a crucial vote tomorrow on a new sewage treatment permit for the Sacramento region.

If approved as the board's staff recommends, the permit would impose strict new limits on the treated wastewater the capital region discharges into the Sacramento River near Freeport.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: water; waterboarding
The potential to be the most important act of Schwarzenegger's governorship.

At stake; millions of acre feet of water available to grow crops in California. If forced to clean up the sewage Sacramento dumps into the delta, millions of acre feet of clean water will be available to the rest of California. The water is currently required to dilute Sacramento waste to make the delta compliant with federal water standards.

1 posted on 12/08/2010 9:15:39 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

For second there I thought they were suggesting water boarding Sacramento Politicians.


2 posted on 12/08/2010 9:16:46 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
For second there I thought they were suggesting water boarding Sacramento Politicians.

I know, what a disappointment.

3 posted on 12/08/2010 9:18:38 PM PST by dfwgator (Congratulations to Josh Hamilton - AL MVP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
For second there I thought they were suggesting water boarding Sacramento Politicians.

They are. Literally. The toilets at the capital building are very literally polluting California largest water source. The clean water necessary to dilute the filth is THE major component of wasted water in the Sacramento River Delta.

4 posted on 12/08/2010 9:28:19 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

I’d say Julian Assange needs an appointment with a water board.


5 posted on 12/08/2010 9:39:22 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

So let me get this straight: Sacramento’s pols deprive the Central Valley of water to save a common fish while their city fouls a major source of water that could be used for agriculture?! Unreal.

Let CA go under and starve, both fiscally and literally. They have voted for it, let them deal with it...


6 posted on 12/08/2010 11:17:57 PM PST by piytar (0's idea of power: the capacity to inflict unlimited pain and suffering on another human being. 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Oh yeah, and to any conservatives still living in CA, esp Freepers, MOVE! Please! And get your families out, too! CA is going to end badly. Very badly. And sooner rather than later.


7 posted on 12/08/2010 11:19:57 PM PST by piytar (0's idea of power: the capacity to inflict unlimited pain and suffering on another human being. 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
The flip side is, current sewer rates will triple, and, if you build a home in the county and need to connect to the sewer, you can expect to pay, not $7,400 connection fee, but a $35,000 connection fee (for single-family home, more for offices or apartments) - this will be a significant cost to contractors and homebuyers. According to the article below, a 1,000 sq foot business would pay $70K to connect. All for an upgrade that may or may not have any impact. from sac bee, september: The sewer district currently meets U.S. Environmental Protection Agency criteria for these pathogens. But the state Department of Public Health believes these criteria, nearly 25 years old, are too dated to rely on. It concluded the risk of exposure to the river downstream of the district's Freeport discharge site requires strict new regulation. Again, the sanitation district disagrees. www.sacbee.com/2010/09/04/3005002/state-board-wants-sacramento-to.html#ixzz17bobVdsH
8 posted on 12/09/2010 2:44:18 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson