Posted on 12/08/2010 7:34:05 PM PST by lakeprincess
"Why is there no record of Michael Savage being banned in the WikiLeaks cables?" asks Mr. Savage himself, who has waged a 19-month battle to have his name scrubbed from a list of "undesirables" banned from Britain, compiled by then-Home Secretary Jacqui Smith
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Is he really that self-obsessed?
If you had an ongoing international issue about you, you’d ask too.
And it pushes the wider point - why is there nothing negative about the obama admin in there?
Why would there be anything negative? These are internal State Department wire cables. It was state department employees that made them concerning THEIR dealings with other governments and observations.
Which is also why nothing is mentioned about Savage. In the grand scheme of things...no one gives a crap. England has a right to ban anyone they want for any reason they want. Just like we do.
In the grand scheme of things, people have a human right to free speech.
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.