I am with you. I like her. She says the right things, and I don’t think it is an act. The “but” is that she is a polarizing figure, and I don’t know if greater exposure during the primaries is going to help her win over the independents or simply deepen the divide. Getting Obama out of office is the most important goal. Going down in idelogiocal flames isn’t going to get us there. So, I am in “wait and see” mode on Governor Palin. She was the only good thing to happen in 2008, but I am not ready yet to jump on the bandwagon for her.
I was around for Reagan, she is Reagan IN High Heels! But better looking, Reagan was not in prime.
Also she Quicker in getting her words out, then any politician in the last 50 years, this is a sign she says what she believes!
Finally, someone who tells the Truth,
She a woman, some seems to think a women can’t run this country, that’s another reason why she needs to be the first women President!
She would do a lot to hurt men having sex with men lifestyle,
Normal would be back in again!
That’s probably the biggest reason that the anti Palin freepers keeping spurring out all the same negatives Reagan lived with, freepers like Pissant (One of our token liberal democrat Trolls and with a sick lifestyle)!
But what would make her less polarizing? It would be if she were less conservative. She’s the first conservative who is at least palatable. OK, well, she’s not really conservative enough for me. But I just think that polarizing isn’t all bad. Sometimes it’s nice to be offered a clear choice.
As for my support, I’m waiting to see. I know they all have supporters and attackers, but if Palin, Huck, Mr. Newt, or that one who’s name I probably shouldn’t mention lest I be banned got the nod, I’d be pretty happy with any of them. I’d love to see someone who’s willing to get in people’s faces and punch back hard like Christie, but he says he’s not interested. Donald Trump? I might be able to swoon for him. He’ll get in people’s faces and punch back hard.