But what would make her less polarizing? It would be if she were less conservative. She’s the first conservative who is at least palatable. OK, well, she’s not really conservative enough for me. But I just think that polarizing isn’t all bad. Sometimes it’s nice to be offered a clear choice.
As for my support, I’m waiting to see. I know they all have supporters and attackers, but if Palin, Huck, Mr. Newt, or that one who’s name I probably shouldn’t mention lest I be banned got the nod, I’d be pretty happy with any of them. I’d love to see someone who’s willing to get in people’s faces and punch back hard like Christie, but he says he’s not interested. Donald Trump? I might be able to swoon for him. He’ll get in people’s faces and punch back hard.
Oh good Lord, for once and all, let's answer the eternal question about Sarah Palin as seen from naysayers, liberals and PDS sufferers:
She is a woman and belongs in the kitchen, barefoot and chained to the stove.
(ichabod1: this is not directed toward you. That statement was the straw that broke the camels back in my patience for the "polarizing/unelectable/inexperienced/dumb argument.)