Really? Where?
Posted on 12/02/2010 1:11:13 AM PST by bushpilot1
The American Patriot Foundation has called on citizens to support LTC Terrence “Terry” Lakin during the countdown to his court martial.
As of this edition, there are only 12 days before Lakin goes to trial.
A group has organized a “Support Terry Lakin Day” series of rallies on Monday, Dec. 6, beginning at 10:30 a.m. in front of Sen. John McCain’s Office, 5353 N. 16th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85016.
The next rally will begin at 12 noon in front of Sen. Jon Kyl’s office, 2200 E. Camelback, Phoenix, Arizona 85016, with the final rally at 2 p.m. in front of Rep. Trent Frank’s office, 7121 W. Bell Road, Glendale, AZ 85308.
And so held Waite, Story and Marshall, as pointed out in Hollister’s cert petition.
Then every single order given by every single officer in every branch of service since 1/20.09 have been illegal. Is that whay you are claiming? For the record?
The courts have ruled this and it has been shown to you time and time again. But you ignore it...
According to you Vattel is the law of the land superceding even the Constitution itself. Given that, I don't find it hard at all to ignore your claims.
You desire LTC Lakin convicted and your could give a damn if he is innocent.
I'm sorry Lakin is going to be convicted but as far as I can see he's guilty as all get-out.
Suggest you and the Judge do a little research.
ROTFLMAO!!!!! Sure, we'll be in touch to schedule some time at the Bushpilot1 College of Law n' Stuff for our education.
Which parts of the Law of Nations? Is the entire book considered law of the land in the United States? If so, why isn't it being taught in law school?
Kerchner is responsible for that little fairytale...
"I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS was that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari. So it looks like Sotomayer and Kagan ignored ethical considerations and stayed in the review of the petition to be sure it got killed, i.e., to be in that room to argue against Certiorari, and to require 4 votes to grant cert instead of 3 ... financial conflict of interest and ethics be damned by those two justices. JMHO."
Kerchner is responsible for that little fairytale...
“I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS was that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari. So it looks like Sotomayer and Kagan ignored ethical considerations and stayed in the review of the petition to be sure it got killed, i.e., to be in that room to argue against Certiorari, and to require 4 votes to grant cert instead of 3 ... financial conflict of interest and ethics be damned by those two justices. JMHO.”
From the Wikipedia entry on “the rule of four.”
“The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court’s own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891.”
The Supreme Court said..in 2003 the Law of Nations has been part of our laws for over 200 years.
Obama is violating chapter XIX of the book.
LTC Lakin should check out a copy from a library the Law of Nations and take it to court and present it as evidence.
There was a time the US navy required a copy of the book on ships at sea.
Lieutenant Colonel Lakin’s own attorneys have said publically that Judge Lind’s ruling on not allowing Obama related evidence is correct.
“Lakin’s new lawyer: Military Judge was Right”
http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=13254
The Obama presidency is violating the Law of Nations.
You cannot say any longer Vattel is obscure and the Founders could not read French.
We know the birth certificate is a diversion.
In the painting ‘The Inauguration of George Washington’, by Ramon de Elorriaga there are two books..one the Bible and the other is Vattel’s Law of Nations.
You purpose in life seems to be to distort information..what are you afraid of..what is your goal..why do you intentionally mislead the readers.
Your godfather Dr. Conspiracy stated Vattel was never mentioned during the Congress in Convention in 1787. He called the poster a liar..he was proven wrong...he edits the post showing his error and bans the poster.
Who are you people.
“If so, why isn’t it being taught in law school?”
Obama did. lol.
With the full court of 9 justices it’s the rule/vote of 4 to grant certiorari to move the case forward.
With two recusals that would have left only 7 justices and it’s then the rule/vote of 3 to grant certiorari to move the case forward.
If sotomier and kagen has recused it is possible that certiorari might have been granted.
it could have been held up by one vote.
The Obama presidency is violating the Law of Nations.
You cannot say any longer Vattel is obscure and the Founders could not read French.
We know the birth certificate is a diversion.
In the painting ‘The Inauguration of George Washington’, by Ramon de Elorriaga there are two books..one the Bible and the other is Vattel’s Law of Nations.
You purpose in life seems to be to distort information..what are you afraid of..what is your goal..why do you intentionally mislead the readers.
Your godfather Dr. Conspiracy stated Vattel was never mentioned during the Congress in Convention in 1787. He called the poster a liar..he was proven wrong...he edits the post showing his error and bans the poster.
Who are you people.
Do you really think that just because some of the Founding Fathers read a book that has ANY special impact on American law?
The Framers were VERY capable of spelling out precisely what they meant by terms and phrases used in the Constitution. In the case of “natural born citizen,” they did not spell it out, IN THE CONSTITUTION.
There was a time, not so long ago when REAL conservatives didn’t try to depend on international law or books written by Swiss citizens to determine the laws of America.
The Founding Fathers/Framers established a process to add to and alter their original conceptualizations of American law and that is precisely what happened to the concept of “natural born citizen” when the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868. There is just no way around “ALL (not some, not a few, not excluding presidential candidates) PERSONS BORN or naturalized...” ALL persons means EVERYBODY. Since 1868, there are two kinds of American citizens: born citizens and naturalized citizens.
End of story.
There are a great many “ifs” in your statement. None of the things you say will happen as the system is corrupt through and through.
From his very own campaign web site:
"Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children."
From factcheck.org:
"In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii)* and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC."
Even assuming birth in HI (yet to be proven), at best he was born a dual citizen. Owing allegiance, at birth, to TWO countries.
He never was at birth, nor is now, a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.
He's a usuper. That's why this issue hasn't gone away like so many wished it had.
The problem with your ‘claim’, to have gone to those addresses, is that Barack or Barak Obama wasn’t the only one in his family to link those addresses to his name; so did Michelle Obama and Stanley Ann Dunham Obama (who has been dead for quite some time).
Neil Sankey is not a 25 cent detective — as he heads up his own agency.
True, If we had a Supreme Court that was composed of honorable men and women they would have already declared obama ineligible.
Really? Where?
There are two books below Washington’s hand. One is open..the Bible..the one below the Bible is the Law of Nations.
Actually if you look at the picture close-up then it's evident that what's below the Bible is a cushion of some kind. Note the tassels on the corners.
“Obama has refused to respond to his personal request and his chain of cmmand has stone walled him with zero response.”
Golly....they were just too busy trying to get DADT repealed. Gates & Mullins have really got their priorities right (not!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.