Skip to comments.
Obama to Freeze Pay for Most Federal Workers (for 2 Years)
NYT ^
| 11-29-10
| Peter Baker
Posted on 11/29/2010 8:15:05 AM PST by pillut48
WASHINGTON -- President Obama plans to announce a two-year pay freeze for civilian federal workers later Monday morning, according to an administration official, the latest White House move intended to demonstrate concern over sky-high deficit spending.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: notbreakingnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: pillut48
Hey, I’d be happy if they freeze my pay at the level the fed workers get paid (average).
41
posted on
11/29/2010 8:39:58 AM PST
by
FrankR
(Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
To: pieceofthepuzzle
As soon as the Poseur gets the smallest pushback from anyone in the government he will crank up the waiver machine. His statements mean absolutely nothing, indeed, they are signal indicators you should expect the reverse to actually happen.
To: glm
Reagan in his deal with Tip O'Neil on the passage of
P.L. 98-21, (H.R. 1900) Social Security Amendments of 1983-Signed on April 20, 1983 agreed to make SS mandatory for all federal employees hired after 1983. The act also increased taxes and raised the retirement age for full benefits from 65 to 67.
There is still a civil service pension system, plus SS and the Thrifty Plan [the equivalent of a 401K program. Federal employees have a three-legged stool of pensions.
43
posted on
11/29/2010 8:41:32 AM PST
by
kabar
To: kabar
"...While a pay freeze will make only a small dent in the federal deficit, it represents a symbolic gesture toward public anger over unemployment, the anemic economic recovery and rising national debt..." B.S! Wont happen. By the end of the week various groups of federal employees will be presenting their cases and 0 will dutifully cave in and start granting exemptions.
The whole thing will turn into another 0 In Wonderland scam.
44
posted on
11/29/2010 8:42:41 AM PST
by
skimbell
To: pillut48
intended to demonstrate concern over sky-high deficit spending Really "intended to demonstrate concern" as apposed to really concerning themselves over this? Hmmpt!
45
posted on
11/29/2010 8:43:07 AM PST
by
ColdOne
(.)
To: pillut48
How about a cut, like I had to take?
Mike
46
posted on
11/29/2010 8:44:37 AM PST
by
MichaelP
(It's the end of the world as they know it, and I'm so glad!)
To: skimbell
No, there will be a freeze. Congress will approve it overwhelmingly. It is good politics.
47
posted on
11/29/2010 8:44:42 AM PST
by
kabar
To: Ann Archy
That is exactly what Obama is preventing with his freeze-pay cuts.
48
posted on
11/29/2010 8:44:45 AM PST
by
csmusaret
(Q: How do they say incompetent failure in Kenya? A: Barack Obama)
To: pillut48
49
posted on
11/29/2010 8:45:49 AM PST
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: pillut48
Can you imagine if Bush had proposed this?
To: pillut48
This will lead to a massive exodus of Federal employees to the private sector.
Sorry, just daydreaming.
51
posted on
11/29/2010 8:50:53 AM PST
by
DManA
To: pillut48
Doesn’t this just about cinch the union take over of TSA?
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
53
posted on
11/29/2010 8:55:44 AM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: pillut48
Preemptive strike.
Obama is worried that the GOP House will cut pay back to 2008 levels and reduce headcount back to 2008 levels.
This is just an attempt to preserve the huge run-up in federal government payroll over the past two years.
54
posted on
11/29/2010 8:58:31 AM PST
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
To: pillut48
And in two years they will all get retro back pay.
55
posted on
11/29/2010 8:59:54 AM PST
by
ladyvet
(I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
To: pillut48
Add a hiring freeze along with workforce reductions. This could be done thru attrition.
56
posted on
11/29/2010 9:02:41 AM PST
by
umgud
To: The Big Boo; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; ...
having some experience in this particular field, let me tell you what it means.....the money for the pay increase was already assumed in each agencys budget request for salaries. This means that without a pay increase this money is freed up. Because you must spend all the money you receive (to avoid lapsing funds), this extra money is now available to hire additional employees.Sorry to report, but thats exactly what happens.
28 posted on Monday, November 29, 2010 11:32:20 AM by The Big Boo (Lone Wolf M/C)
Interesting post, Big Boo.
57
posted on
11/29/2010 9:02:50 AM PST
by
nutmeg
To: hoyt-clagwell
I truly don’t get what you are talking about. Our Secretaries are getting 28,000 a year. One gets 32,000 a year because she has over 30 years. I don’t see anybody getting rich on their sacrifice.
To: SMARTY
My initial thoughts exactly.
59
posted on
11/29/2010 9:06:36 AM PST
by
Daffynition
("Life Imitates Bacon, but Bacon does not imitate Life. Bacon IS life." ~paulycy)
To: napscoordinator
I truly dont get what you are talking about. Our Secretaries are getting 28,000 a year. One gets 32,000 a year because she has over 30 years. I dont see anybody getting rich on their sacrifice. It has been proven fed gov't employees pay is way higher than the private sector for the comparable job. You are also leaving out the generous benefit package.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson