I was not referring to the recent gaffe. I was referring to the informstion thst she needed to be coached about the existence of north and south korea before the election - I was questioning how you get to be an adult without knowing something I knew in grade school.
“I was not referring to the recent gaffe. I was referring to the informstion thst she needed to be coached about the existence of north and south korea before the election - I was questioning how you get to be an adult without knowing something I knew in grade school.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2632741/posts?page=48#48
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/2008-campaign-all-over-again-in-new-book/
OK, but here’s your source of the original accusation against Sarah Palin: “The book, “Game Change,” by the political journalists John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, is based on interviews with more than 200 people with inside knowledge of the campaign, including Mr. Obama at the White House in late June. But all sources were granted anonymity, and in most cases the authors provide no specific documentation for their account.”
I see you trust carte blanche these anonymous sources from political journalists, quoted in a New York Slimes blog.
No problem with those sources, hmmmmm??! When did you learn about checking your sources? What if they’re lying about Sarah Palin? Have you thought about that? When did you learn that people lied in this world, perhaps around first grade?
I know, let’s believe the POS socialist media and blast on Sarah Palin on Free Republic as being an imbecile.