Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$11,000 fine, arrest possible for some who refuse airport scans and pat downs
SunSentinel.com ^ | 11/20/10 | John Lantigua

Posted on 11/20/2010 7:31:28 AM PST by chickadee

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning that any would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport.

That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement. Anyone refusing faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest.

"Once a person submits to the screening process, they can not just decide to leave that process," says Sari Koshetz, regional TSA spokesperson, based in Miami.

(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 11; 1984; airport; eleven; enemyofthestate; scanners; tanda; tsa; tsapervs; tyranny; usandthem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-323 next last
To: chickadee

http://www.blog.joelx.com/odds-chances-of-dying/877/

201 posted on 11/20/2010 10:08:33 AM PST by 444Flyer ("The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power." -Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I had some items stolenout of my bags from a flight yesterday

some meds and my deoderant


202 posted on 11/20/2010 10:10:28 AM PST by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: All
So this is all done in the cause of safety plus to prevent both financial and human loses. The federal government is involved because they handle air safety.

So that begs the question, when will the scanners and groping start at federal insured banks? After all there are more bank robberies in one day then all the terrorist actions on airplanes in a year. We have reports of people bringing weapons into federal insured banks with the intent to commit crimes. So the logical conclusion would be that the federal government must now control access to banks, all in the cause of safety plus to prevent both financial and human loses.

203 posted on 11/20/2010 10:11:50 AM PST by Lockbox (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“Then by that logic we should just shoot anyone trying to flee the scene. Better yet, we should shoot anyone that refuses to go to the airport and “volunteer” for screening. In fact, that means we would screen everyone every day to ensure they are not avoiding the airport and shoot anyone that has not been screened in the past 24 hours.”

You’re dead on about incrementalism. We already don’t have the right to travel without being searched. It’s not in the Constitution, so it can’t be a real right, evidently, 10th Amendment be damned. Screening your car or person when you leave your property is technically legal, by the way the judges have already decided things, at least viewed pragmatically. The only question is how long before we have house-to-house searches “to keep us safe,” and get the transition from republic to globoligarchy over with. Maybe the clowns running the show will be lucky enough to have another MOVE-type event take place, in order to make things seem dangerous enough for them to overtly step beyond the front stoops of folks’ homes.


204 posted on 11/20/2010 10:15:20 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

That is one of the best graphics/charts I have ever seen. Not only is it beautiful, but it is clear and easy to understand. (I usually fail miserably at charts.)


205 posted on 11/20/2010 10:20:56 AM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I care more about liberty and freedom than I do about the fiscal condition of the airlines....their bottom line has been lousy for years, even when the economy was good.

I recently found an old copy of the business section of the L.A. Times in a cardboard box in a closet. It was from 1990. For the hell of it, I looked up the prices of stock back then. UAL, the parent company of United Air Lines, was selling for over one hundred dollars per share. The price per share now is a mere shadow of it’s former value.

I’m hoping the airlines will give campaign contributions to congress critters who will fight this nonsense at the airports.....if the airlines scream at congress for some common sense, perhaps they’ll have better luck than us peons, because so far, congress is ignoring the complaints of “We the People.”


206 posted on 11/20/2010 10:21:52 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation ("This is our moment, this is our movement, this is our morning in America!" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy
Hey, he's only a registered sex offender and lots of FReepers --those who say they're the greatest defenders of the constitution-- think such an extra-judicial post-release execution would not only be perfectly fine and justifiable, but that the executioners should be awarded medals

America -- a great idea, didn't last.

207 posted on 11/20/2010 10:21:52 AM PST by Clint Williams ( America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

There are people on this site that would agree to nightly home searches as long as “it keeps us safe”. From what, they do not know, they just want to “feel safe.”

We have a constitution to protect ourselves from such feeble minded cowards.


208 posted on 11/20/2010 10:22:57 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
I have to say I have believed for some time that there are not a lot of Americans left in America; not enough to uphold it.

You are correct.

America -- a great idea, didn't last.

209 posted on 11/20/2010 10:23:52 AM PST by Clint Williams ( America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

I’m so glad I found it in my search. Good on that site for posting it.


210 posted on 11/20/2010 10:26:20 AM PST by 444Flyer ("The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power." -Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

I wouldn’t say that Chertoff is a victim of guilt by association....however, he is in the private sector now, and has been making tons of money by being a corporate officer of one of the companies that manufacture these naked scanners.


211 posted on 11/20/2010 10:27:11 AM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation ("This is our moment, this is our movement, this is our morning in America!" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: FS11

Bush gave us TSA. He should have just armed the pilots and put an armed marshal on flights. And profiled Muzzies. In fact, that’s what should be done now. America used to be a practical country. It has become a muddled mess.


212 posted on 11/20/2010 10:30:34 AM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: chickadee
Drudge has made this article his central headline: TSA WARNS: SUBMIT OR PAY
213 posted on 11/20/2010 10:31:53 AM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged

Scary post.

Life was easier in Nazi Germany with SS thugs demanding “Ihre Papiere!” than it is no in our airport security lines.


214 posted on 11/20/2010 10:32:29 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

Turning the might of the Federal Gubamint on grannies and kiddies under sanction o fine or prison? Submit or walk?

What have we come to?


215 posted on 11/20/2010 10:35:22 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Do you have any idea how intrusive those interrogations are?

By the time you're answering those 'intrusive' questions, you've already been selected as a person of interest by the ticket, payment, and those flags kicked off from a scan though various listings. In simple terms - profiling.

216 posted on 11/20/2010 10:39:41 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! Â)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
And don't forget little Georgie Soros.
217 posted on 11/20/2010 10:40:45 AM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: brityank
"By the time you're answering those 'intrusive' questions, you've already been selected as a person of interest by the ticket, payment, and those flags kicked off from a scan though various listings. In simple terms - profiling. "

And, you base this on personal experience, or just from what you've read?

I've flown into Israel a number of times. Several times as an active-duty member of the US Navy. They "interrogate" everyone. Some people, they just interrogate more.

218 posted on 11/20/2010 10:45:49 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Nazis...Yeah...

Can you imagine just going to Grandmas house......"You allow us to grope, scan and take pictures of your private parts, or we fine you $11,000 dollars".

This government is so damn out of control

219 posted on 11/20/2010 10:46:20 AM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
I care more about liberty and freedom than I do about the fiscal condition of the airlines....

I'm with you on the liberty and freedom part but this isn't the airlines doing, it's the Federal Government.

What the airlines do about it remains to be seen and they better fight this tooth and nail or they won't last long.

I’m hoping the airlines will give campaign contributions to congress critters who will fight this nonsense at the airports.....

So in the end this is just another shakedown from this fascist Government, quite possible or maybe it's a way for the bamster to Nationalize the industry when it goes belly up.

There is a goal here, just what it is hasn't become clear yet.

One thing is for sure, the goal is not security.

220 posted on 11/20/2010 10:59:14 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson