[EBH]

The advantage is EO can be undone by the next sitting President.

[Uncle Ike]

” The advantage is EO can be undone by the next sitting President. “

In the ‘Absolutely Worst Possible Scenario’, the ‘next sitting President’ might come to power in 20-30 years after a protracted - possibly bloody - struggle for succession...

[Steamburg]

If Barry uses the military, there won’t be a next sitting President.
This is more than troubling. Podesta is financed by Soros. Every “suggestion” from this group has been adopted by the administration within weeks of their “suggestion”. Yesterday Soros, said that if this President can’t get it done then we need to start looking for a new figure.
This is more than ominous. This is an order for action.

[nopardons]

WRONG ! I wish that people would stop saying that. President Bush the younger tried that, with Clinton's EOs and the SCOTUS wouldn't allow him to undo many of them.

[TommyDale]

The EO can also be undone by the Senate.

[maine-iac7]

The advantage is EO can be undone by the next sitting President.

glad you have confidence that there will BE an election in 2012.

ARe you familiar with what Martial Law can mean?

The first thing is, it shuts down Congress for 6 months.

We'll be very lucky to survive the next 2 months until our new Congress is seated. But if an "emergency" presents itself and obummer declares Martial Law - and has another 6 months to rule supreme - do you really think we will have any freedoms left?

In the meantime - I have son whose job takes him back and forth,up and down the country day after day - we are not being told how bad it is out there.

Word to the wise: store up some food.