Of course they do!
Trade is determined by price differences. If the US dollar is overvalued (as it has been for much of the last 40 years), then American goods are more expensive abroad. It's what killed the American steel industry for Pete's sake.
Now, there's a lot we could do in the US to improve our competitiveness (lower taxes on profits and capital), but even those won't be able to overcome a high exchange rate. Now, don't get me wrong -- I do not agree with the current policy of deflating the dollar to drive its value down.
But a stable money supply combined with a balanced federal budget (no constant supply of Treasurys to sell abroad) would help bring our exchange rate back to some semblance of where it should be.
It would do wonders for the trade deficit, too.
Seems we got a lot of people interested in convincing me that a weak dollar increases exports. OK people, first you'll need to show me how the exchange rates go up and down---
--and then explain why the trade balance goes up and down in a way that has nothing to do with exchange rates--
--and when you check it year by year the two are together half the time and go separate ways the other half.
trade deficit | dollar exchange rate | trade | dollar | correlation | ||
1973 | 0.14% | 108.19 | ||||
1974 | -0.29% | 105.84 | down | down | direct | |
1975 | 0.76% | 100.42 | up | down | inverse | |
1976 | -0.33% | 105.62 | down | up | inverse | |
1977 | -1.34% | 107.12 | down | up | inverse | |
1978 | -1.30% | 101.14 | up | down | inverse | |
1979 | -0.96% | 94.46 | up | down | inverse | |
1980 | -0.70% | 95.07 | up | up | direct | |
1981 | -0.52% | 96.03 | up | up | direct | |
1982 | -0.74% | 107.14 | down | up | inverse | |
1983 | -1.63% | 115.69 | down | up | inverse | |
1984 | -2.77% | 125.36 | down | up | inverse | |
1985 | -2.89% | 138.97 | down | up | inverse | |
1986 | -3.10% | 120.19 | down | down | direct | |
1987 | -3.20% | 101.85 | down | down | direct | |
1988 | -2.24% | 89.62 | up | down | inverse | |
1989 | -1.70% | 90.55 | up | up | direct | |
1990 | -1.39% | 92.41 | up | up | direct | |
1991 | -0.52% | 85.01 | up | down | inverse | |
1992 | -0.62% | 85.61 | down | up | inverse | |
1993 | -1.06% | 91.5 | down | up | inverse | |
1994 | -1.39% | 92.01 | down | up | inverse | |
1995 | -1.30% | 87.07 | up | down | inverse | |
1996 | -1.33% | 86.45 | down | down | direct | |
1997 | -1.30% | 90.04 | up | up | direct | |
1998 | -1.88% | 98.49 | down | up | inverse | |
1999 | -2.84% | 94.48 | down | down | direct | |
2000 | -3.85% | 96.06 | down | up | inverse | |
2001 | -3.58% | 103.51 | up | up | direct | |
2002 | -4.02% | 111.21 | down | up | inverse | |
2003 | -4.52% | 98.77 | down | down | direct | |
2004 | -5.23% | 84.38 | down | down | direct | |
2005 | -5.77% | 81.05 | down | down | direct | |
2006 | -5.48% | 84.44 | up | up | direct | |
2007 | -4.84% | 82.37 | up | down | inverse |
Seriously, when I first learned about this it seemed impossible, but when I checked just how cross border trade worked it made perfect sense. Let me know if anyone's interested in what I found out.