[fish hawk]

Actually, Sitting Bull was not a terrorist or an insurgent. He was fighting a defensive war in defense of his country. While Custer was an egotistical ass wipe. I didn't see the book but maybe he got this part right.

[Monkey Face]

Custer was a coward, and therefore a bully. There is nothing redeeming in his military actions.
Frankly, I prefer to have the Sioux in my heritage. I would be ashamed to have Custer there.

[laweeks]

“Actually, Sitting Bull was not a terrorist or an insurgent.”

I quite agree, but with 55 Founding Fathers of extraordinary talent and God-given gifts, I wonder if this White House intruder included any of them in his “book.” It would have to be a minority, lib, or protected class person for him to even consider them. Yeah, like we’re supposed to believe that he actually wrote it.

[Pikachu_Dad]

Custer wasn’t in command. He was part of a much larger 3 army, three pronged attack.