Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fish hawk

Custer was a coward, and therefore a bully. There is nothing redeeming in his military actions.
Frankly, I prefer to have the Sioux in my heritage. I would be ashamed to have Custer there.


35 posted on 11/15/2010 10:46:21 AM PST by Monkey Face (In God we trust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Monkey Face

Custer had many faults to be sure. He was rash, vain, and conteptious of the Indians, but he was no coward. He first gained attention at Gettysburg by leading his Wolverines in a headlong charge against Stewart’s far larger cavalry that was about to hit the Union in the rear at the same time Pickett was attacking the front. It so shocked and confused Stewart that he withdrew. Not the action of a coward.


97 posted on 11/15/2010 12:08:12 PM PST by Hugin ("People will usually tell you their bad intentions if you take the time to listen"--- Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson