Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yaelle

>>(4th Amendment)

Flying may not be a right, but the airlines do not want this kind of invasive search. They are put up to this by Homeland Security.<<

We are arguing 2 different things.

The 4th Amendment doesn’t apply to you when you voluntarily go somewhere. Otherwise they couldn’t have metal detectors in Court Houses (or are you saying that should be stopped too?)

I agree this is wrong on many levels — even legal. Just not constitutional. And it really bothers me when people toss the term about indiscriminately.


189 posted on 11/14/2010 7:25:49 PM PST by freedumb2003 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

It’s not because of the difference between a courthouse and an airport. The reason why metal detectors are OK in courthouses, and why genitalia pat-downs are NOT OK at airports, is because of the difference in the “search.”

Walking through a metal detector is a REASONABLE search. Having your (and your Grandma’s and your 6-year-old’s) crotch probed is NOT.


199 posted on 11/14/2010 7:33:57 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson