I don’t think that “It’s certain” ...
But a sub-launched missile fits all the data. It makes sense.
And Obama’s/the administration’s coverup makes sense. See - THEY don’t anybody else to point start pointing fingers at the Chinese.
Because the Chinese are Obama’s only (non-Muslim) allies.
Which of the following FACTS does the "sub-launched missile " definition fill?
1. There was no radar track from the FAA Los Angeles Regional Radar, Point Mugu NAS or Vandenberg AFB.
2. The DSP satellites which can detect the launch of a model rocket and send alerts to several command centers did not detect a launch.
3. Not one aircraft, ship, police officer, or surfer reported a launch.
The Russians are comrade Obama's main ally. Everything he does is meant to appease them.
looks like a sub launched missile to me.
In the beginning of the clip the missile is all squiggly until it locks on.
seen it a hundred times.
And the reason we didn’t shoot (them) down?
Looks like a missle but where did it come down at?
Except for the data where a photo was taken the next day when the same flight passed over and it looked like another rocket launch.