Posted on 11/13/2010 2:55:59 PM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009
Reporter adds: "I am not just hearing it from the General, I am hearing it from other sources too. It leaves me to wonder if NORAD knows what they are doing."
Next, Hannity is amazed to hear another reporter say "It may be a toy rocket !!!"
"It could be a bunch a kids on a boat, pranking."
(Laughable.)
The General then replies:
"If you go to any fighter squadron, Navy or Air Force, in the world today, they are going to agree with me..."
Note: He is a command pilot with more than 4,100 flying hours, including 407 combat missions during the Vietnam War. In addition to his Vietnam Service, Gen. McInerney served overseas in NATO; Pacific Air Forces, and as commander of 11th Air Force in Alaska. Currently, he is a Fox News contributor, and is a member of the Iran Policy Committee.
So, we now have:
1) The Editor at Jane's Missile Magazine, Doug Richardson, saying: "Unmistakable missile, you can tell from the exhaust plume".
2) The former Deputy Secretary of Defense, and former US Ambassador to NATO Robert Ellsworth saying "Spectacular; takes your breath away; that is an underwater sub launched ICBM missile!" and "Too big a smoke plume for the Taliban" (Gee, that's good to know).
and now we have famed Lieutenant General Thomas G. McInerney saying the exact same thing, only more emphatically, on Fox News.
So:
Whose missile? For what purpose? Related to events in Korea? G-20 warning or reply from China?
Crazy NORKs ?
Why is the US government stone walling its own people?
Embarrassment? Know any military with inside news?
Will more information leak out in coming days from shocked staffers at the Pentagon and NORAD?
Everyone ...?
“That Is A Missile Shot From A Submarine!”
states retired Lieutenant General Tom McInerney, Fighter Pilot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LivRJOWrcpA&feature=player_embedded#!
I don’t think that “It’s certain” ...
But a sub-launched missile fits all the data. It makes sense.
And Obama’s/the administration’s coverup makes sense. See - THEY don’t anybody else to point start pointing fingers at the Chinese.
Because the Chinese are Obama’s only (non-Muslim) allies.
Ah, but any of the rest of us are near racists for not towing the contrail line.
I'm glad he's retired.
As soon as I heard about this I immediately thought of the 1996 TWA Flt 800 disaster. Odd, I haven’t heard or read any comparisons in the media. Perhaps I haven’t been paying attention.
the government is doing the same thing they did with ufo’s.
US, Russian...or Chinese?
No kidding. We've got FReepers calling us "missile truthers" and some who are truly upset that we dare question the contrail story.
What is going on here?
We are the “media” these days and we’ve compared and contrasted it plenty ~ now go take a look at a website that PROVES this is an airplane. It’s a picture taken of the same sector of the sky on November 9 at the same time. There’s a contrail from an airplane in the picture that’s more than incredibly similar to the one in the film: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2626757/posts?page=61#61
Now I don’t know about how reliable these Freepers are, but could be they are on to something!
LOL!
This is what’s going on. Check out the considered opinion and field work of OTHER Freepers ~ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2626757/posts?page=61#61
I want to know where the thing landed......
The press steadfastly refused to report TWA 800 as a shoot-down, despite scores of independent witnesses who saw a rocket rise from the ocean and strike the aircraft. Clinton was in the White House.
I'll be very surprised if they show that Barry Soetero left the US with its pants down.
My guess is they are less reliable than General McInerney and Doug Richardson of Jane's Missiles and Rockets.
I didn’t see this segment, so thanks for posting this. After so many actual experts (as opposed to armchair guessers) saying this was a missile, I’m convinced that’s what it was. The only question remaining is, whose missile was it?
Add this to the Internet speculation that the recent gulf oil rig explosion was actually caused by an NK sub, and we are going to need alot more tin foil.
==
I watched the video and it sure looked like a missile to me.
It certainly isn’t any ordinary plane. It looks like a solid fuel booster to me.
Conceivably it could be some kind of experimental plane, but in that case, where did it take off from? No signs of an aircraft carrier in the area, which pretty much leaves the only reasonable alternative that it was launched from a submarine.
Chinese sub is my guess. I simply can’t imagine our own government taking the risk of firing a submarine launched missile over the U.S. and possibly Canada.
Well he’s 100% wrong. LOL
The story here isn’t the contrail anymore.
It’s the threads like these and how far off those who the media tells us are “experts” on such phenomenon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.