[waynesa98]

The “missle launch” has been basically proven to be a jet.
1 the contrail did not disperse as a rocket would have
2 the flame from a rocket motor would have been much brighter.
3 any large missle shows up big time on radar.
4 only the usa has ever bult a curise missile with stealth. Rockets with current material science can’t be stealthy.
5 an aviation enthusiast has already figure out the plane.

[Goreknowshowtocheat]

It was obviously a Flight 808 from Hawaii headed for the moon.

[melancholy]

2 the flame from a rocket motor would have been much brighter.

Airliners don't have after-burners, right? Then, what was that flame on top, albeit bright or not?

[silverleaf]

and of course, the crew of Flight 808 has been interviewed and provided their flight plan showing they were there at that moment and that was their contrail that suddenly lit up the sky, rose, and then faded to nothing

(crickets)

Call me those who see the fingerprints of China on this one, perhaps with the involvement of their pitbull North Korea

And the band played on, the stock market rose and dipped slightly, rich men played with their gold, and Bambi groveled before the G-20 and confirmed to the world ecomoic leaders what a fool he is

[Hotlanta Mike]

If it was an aircraft, why haven’t we seen a similar contrail every day around the same time?

[dynoman]

Here's #6;

The photo which shows the shadow of the contrail in the sky. There's a shadow because the setting sun is in line with a contrail that basically parallel to the earth's surface. If the contrail was vertical there would be no shadow. Here's the photo;

[jimbo123]

The “missle launch” has been basically proven to be a jet.

Only if you trust the so-called "expertise" of a bird photographer, an anonymous blogger named "Unicorn" who runs an anonymous pseudoscience blog and the liberals who run Snopes.

[OCC]

The “missle launch” has been basically proven to be a jet. (by a blogger?)
1 the contrail did not disperse as a rocket would have (the video was pretty short, how do you know how fast it dispersed?)
2 the flame from a rocket motor would have been much brighter. (It was 30+ miles away and well in to flight. You can see the rocket motor as it heads away from the camera)
3 any large missle shows up big time on radar. (probably, unless someone wants you to believe nothing happened)
4 only the usa has ever bult a curise missile with stealth. Rockets with current material science can’t be stealthy.(It was seen by a traffic helicopter, stealth was not its mission)
5 an aviation enthusiast has already figure out the plane. (I am an aviation enthusiast and I say it was an SLBM).

[dynoman]

#7 It was way too slow moving to be a missle. In the amount of time it was on video a missle would have been to orbital velocity and impacting the target. This thing hangs in the sky - just like an airplane cruising at altitude parallel to the earth’s surface would.

[FARS]

Proven like Obambi’s birth certificate???

And as an earlier poster said it’s amazing how many on FR now try to stifle opinion and tend to vilify those with different opinions as nutcases or post an IBTZ without bothering with facts or their reasons. Definitely not constructive.

[RaceBannon]

picture in post 9 disproves it all

that contrail would have dispersed nearer to the lower ‘source’ if it was just a plane

it HAD to be rising, and fast, or else the contrail that was minutes old, the lower contrail would have been drifted and dispersed

note the MIDDLE of the contrail is expanded, or it is just changing direction in flight, like a missile would, not a plane

and I have been around planes for years