well said.
A bit like comparing Thomas Jefferson to Hugo Chavez.....
Bush is honest, and he is a man of integrity.
Bush is honest, and he is a man of integrity.
Bush is honest, and he is a man of integrity.
Heh heh heh... I’m enjoying this so much...
Comparing GW Bush to Barack Hussein Obama is a waste of time. America destroying, Obama, his America hating wife, Michelle and his entire ilk of America hating, America destroying, Democrats are not fit to take out the garbage of GW and Laura Bush!!! And.....the overwhelming numbers of the American people know it. End of story!!!
Bush is a NORMAL person.
i bought his book :-)
The question that begs asking is that if Bush is rehabilitated, does that mean Jeb is now OK to enter the 2012 prez mix?
Americans are not only missing Bush; sometimes, they’re even pining for the Fords!
“only the unpopularity of Bush and all he represented”
It’s a puzzlement. Bush did some things that angered me, but nothing he did justified the slavering malice that the leftards spewed at him.
Did they just decide to target him for personal destruction in revenge for the Stupid Party having tried to catch Beelzebubba in some of his major felonies?
Was it required to restore symmetry? That is, to prop up the lie that “everybody does it,” that the right is just as bad as the left? In the case of the Clintstones, that was very bad indeed, which would necessitate an extremely high volume of slander and hatred.
Or did they do it for the same reason a dog licks himself? Which is to say, because they could. Did they finally realize that, with the media, the courts, and academia in their pockets they could say absolutely anything, with no regard for truth—or even sanity—and get away with it?
I scratch my pointed head in perplexity. I wish I would come across a Thomas Sowell article illuminating this point.
Harnden thinks Bush’s book isn’t lyrical like Obama’s. That’s because Bush didn’t have Bill Ayers writing it for him.
One thing that was never really recognized about Bush’s low poll numbers at the end of his presidency was that he was only “unpopular” because he had lost the support of a lot of conservatives for doing some things they did not agree with.
Had they stuck with him (not saying they should have exactly, just making a point), I think Bush would have remained quite popular. Except for the anti-war loonies, there was never a deep and wide feeling among Americans that Bush wasn’t, well, a Decider, a straight-talker, a man who put his all into protecting each and every one of us, an honorable man who honored our troops, our people, our history and our place in the world. None of those things were ever in doubt with George W. Bush.
The point is there is a huge (and HUGH) difference between being unpopular for not, essentially, being conservative enough and being unpopular because you are a Marxist hellbent to destroy the U.S.A. from the foundation on up.
Obama isn’t fit to lick the cow $h!+ off W’s boots...well maybe, but that’s about it.