Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAIR Tells Muslim Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow ONLY "Head and Neck" Pat Downs
CNS News ^ | Nov. 12, 2010 | Penny Star

Posted on 11/12/2010 11:02:41 AM PST by NorwegianViking

CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airsafety; cair; flying; hijab; muslims; patdowns; scanner; tsa; tsapervs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: NorwegianViking

:)


41 posted on 11/12/2010 12:12:25 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

Guess they stay home ...


42 posted on 11/12/2010 12:21:52 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra

I will buy one


43 posted on 11/12/2010 12:22:45 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

LOL


44 posted on 11/12/2010 12:23:43 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Better yet: Muslim-only flights, One-way: OUT, bombs optional, no search required.

It would have to be flown by remote control by a non-muzzie. Otherwise it will end up impaling another large building full of people.
45 posted on 11/12/2010 12:30:49 PM PST by crosshairs (Guns have two enemies: Rust and Politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

sounds like a punch line to a joke


46 posted on 11/12/2010 12:37:36 PM PST by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

So does this mean that the KKK can now fly in full garb?


47 posted on 11/12/2010 12:38:49 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

There is no right to fly so if you don’t submit to the scans or to the full pat down you just don’t get on the air plane....next.


48 posted on 11/12/2010 12:51:31 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

Now what to women have that men don’t?

I’ll take “uterus bomb for 1000”, Alexia.


49 posted on 11/12/2010 1:16:35 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

I haven’t seen anyone comment yet on this part...

It also states: “Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down *your own scarf*, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”

This part to me is the most offensive. What would happen to me if I offered to pat myself down?


50 posted on 11/12/2010 1:23:00 PM PST by melkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

LMAO!!!!


51 posted on 11/12/2010 1:51:28 PM PST by mojitojoe (In itÂ’s 1600 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

I think that the pat down regime is ludicrous, but as long as the pat down is the security measure we’re employing, any body part that isn’t patted down doesn’t get on the plane. So, the head and neck pat down only applies to heads-in-a-jar from Futurama.


52 posted on 11/12/2010 2:40:49 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melkor

The perverts watching you would get real excited?


53 posted on 11/12/2010 2:48:25 PM PST by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

At least 99% of all terrorist attacks are done by Muslims. For a summary of the past several years, plus up-to-date daily attacks, see www.thereligionofpeace.com
Given this information, it would make sense to ban Muslims from all U.S. airports, much the same as Saudi Arabia bans non-Muslims from their “holy” cities of Mecca and Medina. This would render the long security lines and most TSA personnel unnecessary, while at the same time making our country far more secure against Muslim terrorist attacks.
Muslims could not fly to the U.S., since they would be banned at our airports. Muslims could not fly inside the U.S. either. An exception could be made for those Muslims who wish to permanently leave the U.S., so they could get on a plane at JFK, etc. and never return.
Also, mosques and sharia law should be outlawed here, much as the practice of any religion other than Islam is banned in Saudi Arabia. Muslims should be banned from service in our government, and (to be redundant) banned from immigrating into the U.S.

Let’s write to our Congressmen and recommend legislation.


54 posted on 11/12/2010 3:37:27 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Exactly right.

I don’t remember any law that forces women (or guys, for that matter) in hajibs to fly.

Those folks can choose to fly, or they can choose to listen to CAIR. But they can’t choose which rules they have to follow and which ones they can blow off.

Well, at least in Oklahoma they can’t.


55 posted on 11/12/2010 4:17:52 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

We call them Scarves here....I suggest body cavity searches for anyone wearing any kind of clothing that hides the face.


56 posted on 11/12/2010 4:40:58 PM PST by halfright (My presidents picture is in the dictionary, next to the word, "rectum".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Then they can walk. Thanks NorwegianViking.


57 posted on 11/12/2010 4:51:55 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NorwegianViking

Strip search the b!tches. Other than the Unabomber and Tim McVeigh, the VAST majority of terrorists in the last 30 years are more likely to have names like Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed than they are to have a name like Alexander Smith. Walks, talks, dresses and worships like a terrorist(Muslim), must be a terrorist(Muslim).


58 posted on 11/12/2010 5:34:18 PM PST by bigredkitty1 (March 5,2010. Rest in peace, sweet boy. I will miss you, Big Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

It’s all BS. It makes my stomach belch acid to think these interlopers have done this to us. wear a hijab indeed. Are you stupid?

Sometimes I think those dope smokers in the ME sat around and dreamed up a way of terrorizing us into being forced on our knees (facing Mecca) as we are scanned. Think about it. The shoe bomber forced us to take off our shoes, a muslim custom before praying. The panty bomber is going to force us to dress defensively, modestly to make up or try to preserve some semblence of privacy. What a bunch of garbage.


59 posted on 11/12/2010 5:48:23 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: soycd; All
== “..uterus bomb..."

Try 'rectal bomb.' Already been used. Oh, and nude-o-scopes as I understand don't detect items in cavities.

60 posted on 11/12/2010 6:04:53 PM PST by Citizen X_Area 51 (Halfrican Obama: A Riddle wrapped in a Mystery inside an Enigma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson