Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txhurl

Good Lord! Help us please! Let’s hope she doesn’t have a lisp and isn’t dyslexic.

We have totally lost the rule of law. This is going to end up in court; there’s no way it can’t, when the rule of law is being totally destroyed.

We need to find somebody who misspelled Murkowski’s name because they didn’t like any of the candidates - a protest vote - and have them sue because by having their vote count for Murkowski they were DISENFRANCHISED! Throw it back in the judicial faces.

Murkowski has made it abundantly clear that her intent all along has been to disenfranchise the primary voters who chose Miller over her.


152 posted on 11/10/2010 4:52:54 PM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

This is going to end up in SCOTUS. I have to go hunt for the supporting data, statues, laws and links on FR within the last couple days.


153 posted on 11/10/2010 5:11:34 PM PST by txhurl (If we can shake Congress like a can of pennies, we can uproot voter fraud like a D-9.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion; txhurl
Around 90% of the write-in ballots have been spelled properly so far, with around 7,600 ballots counted. If that holds, with the addition to the mail-ins, Murkowski has it in the bag even if the misspellings are tossed out. It won't end up in court because she can win without the misspellings.

As for anybody protesting by misspelling her name, that's just dumb - Miller needs every single vote he can get, and a misspelled Murkowski protest vote is not a vote for Miller.
154 posted on 11/10/2010 5:29:40 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson