1. Because other credible people are going to believe you, I think you are mistaken, and I'm just trying to turn the tide a little. I tend to do the same thing with other conspiracy theories that don't seem correct to me.
2. By the way, I don't follow all your posts, but I have always been under the impression that you are one of the good guys around here, so my disagreement is nothing personal. I'm kind of surprised that you believe in something like this.
3. Apparently I have already convinced you that you didn't see "NSA".
BTW, *WHY* was the *CIA* producing ANY video about this?
I think that in the early days of the investigation, a lot of people in the government thought that maybe there was a missile, so the CIA got involved to see if there was any truth in this. When they reached their conclusions, they made an animated video to describe them and gave it to the FBI. At the time, the CIA may have had more expertise in putting together something like this than other agencies. The FBI then released the video to the public.
There is some info on the CIA website about this. They say that the FBI asked them to help and there was a law authorizing them to do so.
According to your theory the CIA must have already made a video and released it to the news media before the accident even happened.
That doesn't explain why you are trying (unsuccessfully) to convince ME I didn't see what I saw.
3. Apparently I have already convinced you that you didn't see "NSA".
Incorrect. I saw a NSA watermark on the 'explanation video' within 5 minutes of the first airing of the TWA 800 'accident'.