(Vanity) Michael Reagan just said Sarah Palin's "too polarizing" to win Presidential election...

Fox News | 11/09/10 | Megyn Kelly

[LaybackLenny]

Sorry for the vanity, but did anyone see Megyn Kelly's interview with Michael Reagan in the noon (MST) hour? I've searched for a post here, as well as for a link to the interview at Fox News, to no avail. He was "handicapping" GOP Presidential contenders for 2012, and essentially seemed to put Huckabee at the head of the field, and basically said Sarah hasn't a chance because she's "too polarizing."

[kosciusko51]

I think they said the same thing about his dad...

[cripplecreek]

I personally don’t think she’ll run but will be the force that drives the winner to victory.

[kosciusko51]

Plus, Huck is a big-gov “compassionate conservative”

[Islander7]

He also said the Huckster would be a good choice. LOL! Not a chance!

[Undocumented_capitalist]

Sad but true.

[pissant]

ROFLMAO

[RC2]

I don’t think she wants to run anyway but she sure scares the hell out of the liberals. She’s of more use doing what she’s doing. People listen to her and she rattles the right cages.

[earlJam]

We can support her any way we can.

But it is still her responsibility to make herself electable to the rest of the population she would need to win.

She has yet to do that.

[r9etb]

Wait ... isn't that the same Michael Reagan that folks trot out as "proof" that St. Sarah is Ronald Reagan's heir?

Ah, well ... Michael Reagan must be just another RINO elitist after all.

[Enchante]

I guess he’s forgetting the fine column in wrote in 2008 comparing her very favorably with his dad -— the only thing different is that ‘polarization’ of leftist fanatics continuing to attack her so viciously.

His dad overcame that (although it continued all his life) and I think SP can, too.

I well remember how in the late ‘70s RR was painted by the MSM as flaky and “far right” yet he won the nomination and then the presidency.

[LaybackLenny]

*ping*

[FrankR]

POLARIZATION is good.

Without POLARIZATION a compass wouldn't work. No one would know which way the north POLE was.

There could be nothing magnetic without POLARIZATION.

There would be no Electricity without POLARIZATION.

Nancy Pelosi has been called "polarizing" as well. It's good that she's polarizing, we have a clear picture where she stands and it's not good for America.

Sarah Palin is also "polarizing", and we have a clear picture where she stands, FOR the good of America.

Without POLARIZATION we have no way to find direction, no clear way to tell the good from the bad.

Thank goodness for POLARIZAION...America's compass points toward Palin... and that's good.

[anita]

This despite Palin gave shout outs to him on many of her speeches. I think Sarah Palin is the ONLY Prez-candidate who could give nightmares to our corrupt journolistas.

[J Edgar]

“... she sure scares the hell out of the liberals ... “

I think this only partially true. She also scares insiders, a corrupt Washington Beltway politicos, in GOP too!

[omega4179]

2 years as governor does not qualify one. (Flame suit on)

[From The Deer Stand]

I get tired of all these political hacks - from both parties - and their “expert” opinion. The only experts are the people in the voting booth and that has been proven time and time again.

[Retired Greyhound]

He’s probably right, but I support her right now anyway.

However, if a more conservative/more electable candidate comes along I will give that person a serious look.

[Glenn]

Michael Reagan is absolutely correct.

[Jaidyn]

If she was a man, the same naysayers would brag how uniting ‘he’ is.