Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bokababe

Well, I’m not sure if they were smart enough even to see it as a new market to be tapped.

We have poured hundreds of billions into Iraq, fixing their infrastructure and repairing their oil facilities. And then they turned around and gave most of the business to the Chinese and others.

The leftist mantra was “No blood for oil.” But the practical result seems to have been “No oil for blood.”

I thought that Bush was far too NICE to Iraq. It seems to me that after having taken out Saddam, who was stirring up trouble and deeply involved in 9/11, it would only have been reasonable for Iraqi oil to pay at least some of the costs of taking him out.


6 posted on 11/09/2010 9:07:53 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
"The leftist mantra was “No blood for oil.” But the practical result seems to have been “No oil for blood.”

Excellent point.

It's just that I would wonder who did get rich off of this action? Certainly not the American people who were stuck with the bill, but military contractors did pretty well. In the political longterm, Islam also did very well.

8 posted on 11/09/2010 9:16:40 AM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson