1. One guy out of the hundreds of thousands watching cable news is the only one who noticed that the rising nose graphic appeared a mere 5 minutes into the original coverage instead of weeks or months later and that the top secret National Security Agency were kind enough to put their name on it. Or ...
2. He's wrong.
Even for you Occam's Razor should indicate the #2 is way more plausible.
BTW I think there might be some holes in the official government story, specifically with regard to the radar data, but in that case there is some hard evidence. You have nothing to rely on but your memory. You memory does not agree with what everyone else saw who was watching the same coverage.
Plus the story is hard to believe for other reasons. Since you're making a big claim you need big evidence to get other people to believe it. Maybe if you had some other evidence that you were the most observant and trustworthy person in the world with the best memory ...
Who am I gonna believe? Trustworthy you, or my damned LYING eyes?
Since you're not looking at the original news report right now, I am not claiming that there is anything wrong with your eyes.
It was on for a few solid seconds, and I literally marveled over it.
This was a little pre-widespread-internet, so I would understand a relative lack of contemporaneous mention.
And believe me, in the heat of action, things can happen that you didn't intend -- like a failure to remove a logo. I never did see that logo/watermark again. There was no graphic logo, just NSA - National Security Agency
I saw what I saw, dude. No amount of trying to convince me otherwise, will work.