Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

The Defense Budget is filled with earmarks just like all the others. Those could be cut. For example, why is it necessary to have money in the Defense budget for Breast Cancer Research? Hit those items which shouldn’t be there anyway!


3 posted on 11/04/2010 8:55:50 AM PDT by Ruth C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Ruth C
Absolutely. It seems to me that the essence of the Tea Party movement is that we need spending cuts. Republicans should not be shy about agreeing to cuts.

What we need, I think, is a quid pro quo: You cut $50B, I'll cut $50B. You target Defense? Let me choose where in Defense. I'm targetting Education, but I'll let you choose where in Education.

Make it a joint effort so that it's really bipartisan.

Now, I suspect that the Democrats won't want to have anything to do with this method -- and they should be beaten about the head and shoulders with a giant stick over their refusal to engage in a bipartisan effort at cutting spending. WHAM! WHAM! WHAM!

6 posted on 11/04/2010 9:07:08 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson