Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin; Beckwith
Meg Whitman did no run as a conservative, She ran as a moderate, progressive Republican.Both Whitman and Fiorina avoided Sarah Palin, did not have the proper platform array. They were wrong.

It should be sinking in by now that running as a progressive results in DEFEAT.

The same result for Fiorina who took the same “moderate” stand, hoping that independent voters would flock to them.Well thats not the case.

The Karl Rove model is officially “history”.

If Republicans do not join the conservative camp, they soon will be “history”.That's what the million dollar boondoggle campaigns of Whitman and Fiorina tell us.

The same can be said for Massachusetts races.

14 posted on 11/04/2010 6:46:53 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7

You don’t get it....

In states where the democrats/leftists outnumber the conservatives you are not going to win elections with Tea Party types. Wanna argue that? Try running liberals in deep Red states and see what happens.


16 posted on 11/04/2010 6:52:24 AM PDT by misterrob (Thug Life....now showing at a White House near you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Candor7

No, all that sinks in with the idiots in charge is that now no Republican can possibly ever win there since the liberal ones lose.

A Chris Christie type could get elected there in a walk. However, the result would likely not be the same as NJ, because with the ballot measure system in CA, the state is basically ungovernable. It is a perfect example of how direct democracy does not work. People vote for spending increases and won’t vote for tax increases. It’s a mess.


17 posted on 11/04/2010 6:52:54 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Candor7

The Karl Rove model is officially “history”.

********************

It was always crap. A 22. caliber short in the war of ideas.

But Rove was and remains the most loved catamite in the neocons’ neoBabylon.


22 posted on 11/04/2010 6:59:47 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (We are going to punish our enemies, get in their faces and punch back twice as hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Candor7

The “squishy” pro-abortion, easy on illegals/guest worker, Climate Changer-type GOP’ers is a recipe for disaster.

RINOs are going to be a dying breed if we are to survive the next 25 years as a nation.

McAmnesty, Grahamnesty, Collins, Snowe, Lugar, Brown, Kirk and their ilk need to lose via Primary with good, principled candidates.

I kept hearing the talk show hosts (some) moan about Mike Castle being on board 70% with the Conservative Agenda vs. 0% with Coons...

The Tea Party will learn, but I like O’Donnell.

What the GOP and Tea Party need to understand is that they will be under 300% more scrunity than their Democratic opponent because the Liberal media serves as free marketing, research and attack machine for the Left.

I want to move to SC and run against Lindsay Graham now in anticipation on 2014, if I had the money.


40 posted on 11/04/2010 7:26:52 AM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Candor7
It should be sinking in by now that running as a progressive results in DEFEAT.

Brown and Boxer ran as progressives...and won big. In a wave election that was heavily against them.

59 posted on 11/04/2010 9:44:27 AM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson