Posted on 11/03/2010 8:16:45 PM PDT by kidd
Because Bysiewicz is dumber than a pile of rocks. My apologies to rocks for equating them with the dumbass Connecticut SoS.
Rossi was on Levin’s show the other nite and he mentioned that your system of voting is by mail?? How did that evolve?
Personally I think that’s an outrageous system (if in fact that’s the way they do it) even more open to fraud. Rossi kept saying the envelopes must be postmarked correctly etc etc.
Good luck with his election. I hope to God he wins.
Yes, that is an affront to rocks. :)
The pile of rocks postponed her press conference until later today. Maybe the results weren’t to her liking so she needs to stuff a few more ballot boxes.
CT FREEPER PING!
CT is a one party banana republic. Just looking at the map of the house races. Solid red, even some red districts in NY of all states. Not so in CT. Dark Blue across the state. I noticed in my 5th district in CT the RAT Murphy won , even though he’s a Pelosi rubber stamp. The state of CT has been gerrymandered so it’s almost impossible for the RAT to lose. I can’t wait to move out of CT </rant>
“Rossi was on Levin’s show the other nite and he mentioned that your system of voting is by mail?? How did that evolve?”
I think the answer to that publicly is to ‘save money’ - but as you say, totally open to all kinds of fraud, which we’ve seen in 2004. Rossi truly won in 2004, and was declared and I think certified before the two ‘recounts.’
We’re fighting this year - I’d like to see a return to the polling places. I think we’ve got those for the Presidential elections still - but I could stand to be corrected.
Your prayers to God’s ears for Dino...
Is this really true?? I thought they were still counting! If so, woooooo hoooo!!!
Well, we know that she can't read or she might have run for governor instead of AG. I'm pretty sure she can't count or add, either.
I’m sure they’re in Bridgeport looking for more votes as we speak.
Because Bysiewicz is dumber than a pile of rocks.
~~~~~~~~~~
Those who’ve been researching this deceitful cypher in our White House and attempting to discover who he really is, will remember Susan Bysiewicz .. Sec. of State for Connecticut.
Leo Donofrio filed suit on behalf of a CT resident who raised the issue of Bysiewicz performing her sworn duty in confirming the eligibility of BHO on the CT 2008 presidential ballot.
She’s a democrat .. probably is part of Soros’ Sec of State project.
~~~~~~~
In 1998, she sought the Democratic nomination for Secretary of the State. At the state Democratic Convention, she lost the party’s endorsement for the nomination, to Representative Ellen Scalettar, but won enough delegates’ votes to qualify to run for the nomination in a primary. She won both the nomination, and, in the general election in November, the office itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Bysiewicz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cort Wrotnowski contacted the Secretary of State’s office in his home state of Connecticut and inquired as to what steps the Secretary of State had taken to determine the eligibility of the Presidential candidates. On October 17, 2008, an attorney from the Secretary of State’s office, a Mr. Ramos, told Wrotnowski that “it’s not our job” to examine the eligibility of the candidates.
Wrotnowski believes that under the State laws of Connecticut, it is clearly the responsibility of the Secretary of State to examine and verify the eligibility of all candidates.
Wrotnowski believes that Mr. Ramos’s statement was an admission that the Secretary of State of Connecticut had failed to protect the integrity of the electoral process.
A lawsuit was brought against Secretary of State Bysiewicz in the Connecticut Supreme Court (Case number SC 18264) for failure to carry out the laws of Connecticut.
The lawsuit was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court where it was reviewed by all nine justices. At least five of the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices decided on December 15, 2008 that this case would not be heard in open court.
http://www.cusc.org/cases/Wrotnowski-v-Bysiewicz/
~~~~~~~~~~
And from the spawn of George:
$$$
OPINION
DECEMBER 15, 2008.It’s Time to Junk the Electoral College
We don’t need an amendment to do it
By JONATHAN SOROS
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122930124441705413.html?mod=rss_opinion_main
Bruce...I remember him talking about that too now that you mentioned it. Outrageous. Voting laws need to be repealed back to 2000. It must be worked on too. Missouri still has paper ballots they are ‘color in the oval’ but It’s better than electronic (imo).
More of an update:
Only an estimated 74% have been counted - we’re a laughing stock (compared to the rest of the nation) - thank God this isn’t the 51st seat waiting on it like this, but we prayed to God that it would have been...
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/04/cnn-decision-desk-update/
“I’m sure they’re in Bridgeport looking for more votes as we speak.”
Actually it’s in trunks in Bridgeport, but I digress. We must NOT allow this to happen again (speaking as a voter in WA for Rossi in 2004...)
Well I wouldn’t worry about the ‘laughing stock’ too much. Our Nation, The United States of America (sorry..not trying to be dramatic), has become a ‘freakin’ laughing stock throught-out the world. Even our enemies are laughing at us albeit for a different reason.
Washington is due for a storming of conservatives...
Still praying
The Diapercrats don’t follow the rules, or laws, or the Constitution, and yet they can’t understand why people don’t like them.
“don’t even think NV was stolen”
Oh that one was stolen alright. Every cheat in the book was used on that one. They could not take any chance with that one. Much of it can be prosecuted. The SOS of NV should be prosecuted on federal charges for allowing food and money for votes. The union involvement with the emails should be prosecuted. And more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.