Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Switches! Now Calling CT Gov Race for Foley(R)!!!

Posted on 11/03/2010 8:16:45 PM PDT by kidd

Just announced on channel 3 (CBS affiliate)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; connecticut; ct2010; foley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: gnickgnack2

Using number from ABC news website, it appears that 60% of Bridgeport is in with Malloy taking approx. 75 % of the vote in Bridgeport. Baesd on these numbers, and assuming the remaining precincts have the same number of votes per precinct and vote in the same ratio as the counted precincts, Foley should win by over 3,000 votes (554,671 to 551,377).


101 posted on 11/04/2010 6:35:26 AM PDT by wise_caucasian (Vote calcuations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: kidd; nutmeg

It was ridiculous on election night that despite Foley maintaining a majority of votes (most of the time), Malloy was constantly checked as the winner. WTF?


102 posted on 11/04/2010 6:41:43 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wise_caucasian

The SOS insists Malloy is the winner. I normally don’t scream voter fraud....don’t even think NV was stolen (the Dems had an incredible GOTV machine there this year).

But, if Malloy pulls it out, that is incredibly suspect......there must be an investigation.


103 posted on 11/04/2010 6:52:39 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
But, if Malloy pulls it out, that is incredibly suspect......there must be an investigation.

The SOS in CT claims the vote spread in the remining New Haven precincts was app. 21,000 - 3,000 for Malloy. Why are the hard-core Dem precincts ALWAYS the last to report?? (That's rhetorical, because I'm sure I know the answer). The cities' totals should be tallied first, then they can't come in with "just the amount they need" at the end. This happened with the Governor's race in OR and the Senate race in WA. I'm hoping, with a stronger GOP presence in many of the state legislatures and statehouses, we'll see some changes. It's the SAME damned story!

104 posted on 11/04/2010 7:15:43 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

What’s the status in Alaska with Miller/Murkow? Can’t seem to get a handle on it anywhere.


105 posted on 11/04/2010 7:20:58 AM PDT by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dools0007world

Miller lost to “write-in” essentially.

Since these are hand written, they will take forever to count and decide what each voter meant, and how many they will give to Murkowski.

They will probably give her enough, since “write-in” has a big lead.

I would say that it’s nearly certain that Miller lost to Murkowski.

Of course, we really don’t know how many write-ins are for Murkowski and it’s still possible that somehow a lot of the write-ins are not for her.


106 posted on 11/04/2010 7:32:49 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“Did they track down the illegal aliens the Dems paid off to pretend to vote on the pre-written fake ballots they worked on during the contrived 2-hour delay?”

Kind of like the power outage and machine shenanigans in NV? Vote Fraud must be one of our key issues - everywhere and anywhere it is happening. We’ll be watching closely in KingCo in the next two to three days as they count the last of the ballots across this state also. Some people are saying it may come down to Snohomish County and Spokane - Rossi’s down right now by about 28,000 votes...with 1.6M cast and about 500,000+ to go.

Go Rossi!!


107 posted on 11/04/2010 7:59:01 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dools0007world

they don’t start the opening of the write-in ballots until next Wednesday.


108 posted on 11/04/2010 8:06:20 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: All

Congratulations to CT.


109 posted on 11/04/2010 8:11:23 AM PDT by newzjunkey (CA FreeperÂ… so now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

“All that will be left in this place are welfare deadbeats.”

Same thing is happening to CA. Now if we can just contend with all the CA and NY RAT refugees that insist on trying to ruin our states. That’s one of the next great battles for the soul of the nation. That and opposing the ‘great bailout’ for those irresonsible socialist states.


110 posted on 11/04/2010 8:19:30 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Congratulations to CT.

Not quite, the Rat took the lead when New Haven finally reported. I think that Connecticut is a Banana Republic right now with how this race was stolen by the Democrats.

111 posted on 11/04/2010 8:20:41 AM PDT by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: nbenyo

“The whole district has reported except the city of Bridgeport”

This has got to be prevented in the future. They either report on time, or have any remaining votes not counted put through EXTREME scrutiny by the courts.


112 posted on 11/04/2010 8:22:29 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

“Many victories..to celebrate. It’s a great start”

Agreed!


113 posted on 11/04/2010 8:30:05 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

“I thought after Blagojevich there was dissatisfaction with Quinn so people in IL wanted a change.”

I think like in many places and with only two working parties (really only one), ‘the people’ don’t always know what they want, nor even why they want something (someone.) When someone doesn’t even know why they’re voting for someone, that is a huge problem in my book. We’ve got many people being led by their noses like this (as Harrah’s employees in NV.)


114 posted on 11/04/2010 8:35:21 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Isn’t that the truth.


115 posted on 11/04/2010 8:36:21 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (No Compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

Haven’t read anything about your race there in WA...how’s that going?


116 posted on 11/04/2010 8:39:01 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (No Compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

“Adding to the controversy, Foley said Wednesday that he was forming a transition team to smooth the way for taking office — on the same day Malloy announced his own transition team.”

Oh boy...


117 posted on 11/04/2010 8:40:31 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Ct is one party state- the law is merely incidental.

_:)


118 posted on 11/04/2010 8:41:14 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; NYRepublican72; newzjunkey

“Bysiewicz says official tally of governor’s expected at noon”

So we’ll know ‘officially’ in 1/2 an hour. Why she opened her yap yesterday is beyond me. That along with the Bridgeport fiasco makes this election VERY suspect.

But then, either way it goes, I am sure there will be lawsuits.


119 posted on 11/04/2010 8:42:31 AM PDT by Betis70 (First the House, then the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

Here’s the WA SoS page (our SoS is a moderate pubbie):
http://vote.wa.gov/Elections/WEI/Results.aspx?RaceTypeCode=O&JurisdictionTypeID=1&ElectionID=37&ViewMode=Results

While Rossi is down, I like the discussion on the FR WA ST page about where a lot of the remaining votes are:
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/profiles?location=95
swatter 11/03/2010 1:00:41 PM PDT

Hmm, I looked closer and partial counties included Snohomish and King. King County must by Skykomish and not many?

So, it comes down to Snohomish and Rossi is well-liked there.

This may be a pickup.
++++++++++++++++

Now that said, it’s WAY too close and I think it’s probably 75% chance as we speak that Murray and her surrogates in KingCo somehow find a way to ‘pull this out of the hat.’ I’m concerned, shall we say, not that we’re not doing all we can about this.


120 posted on 11/04/2010 8:50:54 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson