Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lexinom

I’m not saying that nothing dastardly took place. I am saying that poll numbers do not under any circumstances constitute hard facts.


88 posted on 11/03/2010 10:16:01 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911

No, but we need to use the language. The Left has been doing this for years. Ayn Rand said something to the effect that whoever controls the language controls the culture. It is true something is not “hard” if there’s a 0.000001% chance it may be wrong, but for all intents and purposes, it is hard, if that makes any sense. We cannot afford to continue being wimps.


90 posted on 11/03/2010 10:22:41 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911

I believe that Lexinom is correct and while Polls would not hold in a court of Law they certaintly would get people thinking. If multiple polls were this far off in NV and not other states then that implies something isnt right. In the latest poll by Mason-Dixon, they predicted that Heck would win the right to represent Nevada in the House. Heck won. The other recent polls from Nevada were accurate, why not this one?


92 posted on 11/03/2010 10:42:26 AM PDT by Black_Shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson