1 posted on
10/28/2010 6:13:31 PM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
This is total crap!
But we out number the illegals.
Vote November 2.
2 posted on
10/28/2010 6:15:47 PM PDT by
nagdt
("None of my EX's live in Texas")
To: Kaslin
3 posted on
10/28/2010 6:15:57 PM PDT by
Red Steel
To: Kaslin
Another farcical skit from the Ninth Circus!
Lamh Foistenach Abu! 4 posted on
10/28/2010 6:18:07 PM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN '69 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: Kaslin
Much as I respect and admire the governor, verbal outrage is not going to get the job done.
To: Kaslin
Is there no end to the treachery of these scu&bags?
8 posted on
10/28/2010 6:25:09 PM PDT by
ripley
To: Kaslin
Why should there be a citizenship requirement to vote, but not to be president?
9 posted on
10/28/2010 6:33:51 PM PDT by
umgud
(Wear your Border Patrol hat to the polls)
To: Kaslin
How about the State of Arizona telling the 9th Circuit to put it where the sun doesn't shine .... by going ahead and enforcing their laws in spite of this ruling.
Works for me, let the SCOTUS sort it out.
11 posted on
10/28/2010 6:54:17 PM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
To: Kaslin
Illegal aliens are NOT immigrants they are INSURGENTS, invaders, felons...
13 posted on
10/28/2010 7:38:17 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: Nachum; markomalley; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; 70th Division; ...
14 posted on
10/28/2010 8:05:59 PM PDT by
raptor22
(The truth will set us free)
To: Kaslin
Practically speaking, how many American voters could prove their citizenship on 11/2? And with so many fake ID’s out there, would your average poll worker know the difference?
15 posted on
10/28/2010 8:10:54 PM PDT by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: Kaslin
Pushing citizenship for illegals while destroying the concept of citizenship. This is truly staggering. Just incredible.
16 posted on
10/28/2010 8:28:06 PM PDT by
jmacusa
(Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
To: Kaslin; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...
17 posted on
10/28/2010 9:34:07 PM PDT by
HiJinx
(I can see November from my front porch - and Mexico from the back.)
To: Kaslin
Did not read the whole article so it might have mentioned this.
Indiana requires photo IDs in order to vote. The law was challenged all the way to the US Supreme Court where it was upheld. I have been told that Indiana's law is the most restrictive in the country concerning photo ID.
If this is true, then the 9th Circuit's ruling is just symbolism over substance as the question has already been settled and once again the 9th will have to be taken to the woodshed.
20 posted on
10/29/2010 2:29:35 AM PDT by
M.K. Borders
(All I require of my government is the liberty my Grandfathers were born to.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson