To: Lou L
I’m grateful for early voting this year.
I very well may be unavailable on Nov 2nd,
but have no way to know for sure.
Besides, I couldn’t wait to get out and vote against the Marxists.
45 posted on
10/25/2010 10:17:49 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: MrB
My husband just went to vote in the last half hour or so. He starts a new job in Ohio next Monday (we live in AR now), and wanted to make sure he was able to vote. He wanted one of his last acts in Arkansas to be helping get Blanche Lincoln kicked out of the Senate ;)
50 posted on
10/25/2010 10:44:36 AM PDT by
Hoosier Catholic Momma
(Arkansas resident of Hoosier upbringing--Yankee with a southern twang)
To: MrB
Although the distinction between voting with "absentee ballots" and actual early balloting is probably very murky, I agree there should be a provision made available for those who are unable to physically be at their polling place on November 2. That is completely different than opening up the polling booths for those who just interested in getting an early start on their Christmas shopping.
"Early voting" to me, seems rife for all sorts of abuses, especially the analysis and reporting of the early results. I'm glad you've voted to axe the Marxists, however.
52 posted on
10/25/2010 11:15:08 AM PDT by
Lou L
(The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson