Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAF Sues Eric Holder, FBI Over Misdemeanor Gun Rights Denial
Second Amendment Foundation ^ | October 20, 2010 | TONY SALAZAR

Posted on 10/25/2010 5:39:24 AM PDT by Idabilly

Acting on behalf of a Georgia resident and honorably discharged Vietnam War veteran, the Second Amendment Foundation today filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation over enforcement of a federal statute that can deny gun rights to someone with a simple misdemeanor conviction on his record.

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotsforamerica.ning.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: banglist; ericholder; firearms; gungrabber; holder; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Idabilly

And that’s a big universe, isn’t it?


21 posted on 10/25/2010 11:19:00 AM PDT by Pecos (Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Oppositional defiant disorder: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia ***
Oppositional defiant disorder is a pattern of disobedient, hostile, and defiant behavior toward authority figures. Causes
www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001537.htm


22 posted on 10/25/2010 11:51:17 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Conflict is inevitable; Combat is an option. Train for the fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

When explaining this to someone, I got the question
“wouldn’t this be applied to all the brat teenagers being raised to defy their parents?”

Nope. Defying parents is “PC”. Defying government is a disorder.


23 posted on 10/25/2010 11:56:33 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Idabilly

The Universe of MCDV Offenses

Who made the determination that this was/is legal? An AG?


24 posted on 10/25/2010 12:21:52 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Conflict is inevitable; Combat is an option. Train for the fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
They, the almighty fedgov.. does.

Read this...

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=1998_register&docid=fr30jn98-11

25 posted on 10/25/2010 1:16:42 PM PDT by Idabilly (Are you going to pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
I had always heard that you needed to have a felony conviction to lose your rights under the 2nd Amendment - since when does a misdemeanor equate with a felony?

The federal definition of a felony is any offense for which you could have received a sentence of over one year's imprisonment, even if a lesser or suspended sentence was actually imposed. Neither did it have to be from a federal court; any conviction anywhere counted, even 1$ hunting/fishing violations and traffic offenses.

It was for this reason that Senator Ted Kennedy was referred to as a *convicted felon* after leaving the scene of the Mary Jo Kochpecne drowning. Though he did not receive a 1-year-plus sentence in that case [he got a suspended sentence, of course- he was a Kennedy, after all- he could have received up to three years.

26 posted on 10/25/2010 1:16:54 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson