Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: combat_boots
With relatives who fought on each side of CW I, I can say with conviction that the war was over economic control of the future of the United States and its future.

Can you elaborate on that?

61 posted on 10/20/2010 9:26:26 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Oh. Well, in brief.....

On my dad’s side, people ran to W Va. The guy there was in the cavalry. They lost everything. Where they went to was ignored as a part of the post-CW economy. Small farmers, small businessmen, miners, facotry workers came out of that line of the family mostly, and they turned into hill folk, having been property owners previously.

On my mom’s side, the guy fought for the North. That side of the family were and continued to become professionals. They owned intellectual and political capital. It shows all through the ancestry and my own upbringing.

If you look at the Mason-Dixon line, you’ll see the disparity arising from which parts of what states got developed after CW I. My lineage illustrates perfectly how that split took human form.

The basis for industrialization posed a threat to the South, yes, but who owned the transport and supply lines was the key. We all know the rest, but the human cost of that has a lineage, too, like that in my own family. One side was hoy toy and the other not. The hoy toy side was and is Northern.


82 posted on 10/20/2010 9:57:54 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson