Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
For the sake of argument, I would be willing to concede that the photo you posted represents a Northern unit.

But, do you admit that some blacks fought for the South? That's the real issue. The photo in question is simply a distraction.

49 posted on 10/20/2010 9:06:34 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
But, do you admit that some blacks fought for the South? That's the real issue. The photo in question is simply a distraction.

Some did, but in nowhere near the numbers that have been bandied about on this thread. The overwhelming majority served unofficially in supporting roles as teamsters, cooks, servants, laborers, and the like, and there is no doubt that by doing so they freed up a lot of white men to do the actual fighting. A very small percentage may have served in the ranks. But the idea that tens of thousands of blacks served side-by-side with their white counterparts as combat soldiers is not supported by any evidence I've seen.

54 posted on 10/20/2010 9:14:53 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson