Posted on 10/20/2010 1:51:32 AM PDT by GonzoII
Tuesday October 19, 2010Court: No Immunity for Officers Who Arrested Pro-Life Advocates
RICHMOND, Virginia, October 19, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit Monday upheld a district court decision that denied the request of several Maryland state police officers to be immune from a lawsuit filed by attorneys representing pro-life advocates. The officers had handcuffed and arrested the 18 pro-life advocates for sharing a peaceful pro-life message along a public street in August 2008. Among those arrested were three young women who were later shackled, strip-searched, and detained overnight. Pro-life advocates shouldnt be handcuffed and arrested for expressing their beliefs, said Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Counsel Daniel Blomberg, who is representing the pro-lifers. The 4th Circuits decision is a positive development for our clients, who deserve justice after what they endured. In its order, the court found that arguments that the troopers culpably enforced a violation of free speech rights protected by the First Amendment, and that the arrests constituted retaliation based on the content of speech, were sufficient to deny the troopers request for immunity for the time being. The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland refused to dismiss the lawsuit in June 2009. The court wrote that the pro-lifers allegations plausibly alleged an absence of probable cause [for their arrests] and that the absence of probable cause would have been clear to a reasonable law enforcement officer. In August 2008, at least 12 state, county, and city police officers handcuffed the 18 pro-life advocates in Defend Lifes Face the Truth Pro-Life Tour. They had started their peaceful pro-life event along a public road in Harford County but relocated to the town of Bel Air after being told by officers to leave the county for not having a county permit. The officers then arrested them in Bel Air without explanation. Once in custody, three young women among the group arrested - two of whom were teenagers - were subjected to two rounds of strip searches. Only after the strip searches and a night spent in jail were they told why they were arrested. A week after their release, the state dropped the charges ultimately filed against them: loitering, disorderly conduct, and failure to obey a lawful order. None of the participants were ever charged with any sort of permit violation. |
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.
Oh, I goggled the story you referenced. Nasty nasty story. A collusion of county sheriff, State Troopers, FBI etc. I really can’t understand how my parents pined for the “good old days”.
Or crossing the line, either at the shoulder or at the center.
Let’s face it, If they ant you they will find a reason.
Or crossing the line, either at the shoulder or at the center.
Let’s face it, If they want you they will find a reason.
“Money usually buys the Sheriffs around here. “
Well, I’d guess it’s up to you and fellow patriots to change that.
“We had one that actually tried to do his job.”
Did you back him up, with words, the law and guns if necessary?
You’re giving me a bunch of ephemeral stuff that I can’t anchor on.
Small town run by local big money, was mostly farmland until oil boom, roughnecks moved in. Most downtown commercial property owned by family of bankers and friends. Chamber of Commerce runs the town.
It is a dry County. The dope peddlers, bootleggers and the “elected” Sheriff are rumored to be controlled by them.
Surely you jest about the guns and law. They are the law. :0)
Small town run by local big money, was mostly farmland until oil boom, roughnecks moved in. Most downtown commercial property owned by family of bankers and friends. Chamber of Commerce runs the town.
It is a dry County. The dope peddlers, bootleggers and the “elected” Sheriff are rumored to be controlled by them.
Surely you jest about the guns and law. They are the law. :0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.