Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL
This is why we should not jump to conclusions and support virtual unknowns like Christie, Scott Brown and such.

My thoughts, precisely.

I hope that Mitch Daniels was thinking of a national consumption tax, and misspoke when he called it a VAT, which is quite different.

If he really supports a VAT, then he's toast with conservatives.

9 posted on 10/15/2010 6:24:10 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

“If he really supports a VAT, then he’s toast with conservatives.”

I agree. I will never even consider supporting someone who wants a VAT. The VAT is the worst post tax scheme. It is a vast money maker with little visibility and accountability. The rats would go wild with a VAT.


33 posted on 10/15/2010 7:11:37 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

A flat tax OR a national consumption tax is looking at—not both.


64 posted on 12/24/2010 6:56:38 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson