Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. attorney: Nothing Americans can do about eligibility
WND ^ | October 14, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 10/15/2010 6:12:49 PM PDT by RobinMasters

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-152 next last
To: mlo

“The only remedy to remove a sitting President is impeachment.”

Historically, that is clearly not the case...


61 posted on 10/15/2010 9:07:41 PM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

bunch of prevaricating losers


62 posted on 10/15/2010 9:49:19 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omegadawn
Thanks
63 posted on 10/15/2010 10:22:35 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

thanks..clear


64 posted on 10/15/2010 10:24:19 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NOBO2

His father Frank Marshall Davis. His mother could have been his grandma. Maybe Stanley claimed the baby to keep grandma her job at the bank.


65 posted on 10/15/2010 10:24:32 PM PDT by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

But Nixon was a Republican!Democrats can’t be prosecuted for malfeasance,misfeasance,or just plain crimes.


66 posted on 10/15/2010 10:30:15 PM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

Yeah, we were talking about that tonight.


67 posted on 10/15/2010 11:23:13 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

He looks strongly like both Stanley Ann Dunham and her father.


68 posted on 10/15/2010 11:48:47 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jarofants

He looks almost like the grandfather, not at all like the grandmother.


69 posted on 10/15/2010 11:58:57 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

It should be taken as Self-evident that the United States Constitution means absolutely nothing to protect the reserved rights of the people so long as the Federal Governments own hand picked employees in black robes are the final authority on enforcing and “interpreting” it.


70 posted on 10/16/2010 12:55:19 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The old story of crabs in a bucket. Only here it is we the
people in place of the crabs. In the place of our poser
who wishes he was a natural born citizen—May the bird of paradise fly up his nose-an elephant caress him with his toes
May he know intimately the sailors curse for he is a mag a scag a bloody rag a slippery slimey slut—may his days be few and his office taken by another-I can’t say it any better.


71 posted on 10/16/2010 5:46:34 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

I think his Administration pretty much proves what todays mere politicians think of the Constitution they swear or affirm to support. The other JFK from Mass. (the first one) was Impeached as he drove by the book exchange— didn’t make much
difference as EEyore said.


72 posted on 10/16/2010 5:51:33 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

He looks like the stuff I flush away after eatin too many black beans.


73 posted on 10/16/2010 6:16:20 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I heard that before,it’s possible that Dumham adopted obama and returned to Hawaii and registered his birth. Regardless of how he was born or where ,obama is not a natural born citizens and is not the President of the U.S..


74 posted on 10/16/2010 7:10:10 AM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: StonyBurk

we’re crabs now?

dang


75 posted on 10/16/2010 9:28:09 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Instead of telling us who doesn’t have standing perhaps these experts could tell us who does.


John McCain would have standing. Sarah Palin would have standing and the Republican National Committee on behalf of McCain-Palin would have standing.
However none of those parties chose to file suit, enter an existing suit as a co-plaintiff or even file an amicus brief in support of any of the Obama eligibility lawsuits that have been filed.
US District Court Judge David O Carter contemplated granting standing to Alan Keyes but decided against it on the grounds that Keyes had no chance of election since he was only on the ballot in three states.
McCain and Palin could show direct and immediate injury from the election of an ineligible Barack Obama since they were the only other persons to actually receive electoral college votes.
Think of standing like this: if there is a two car automobile accident and you are an observer of the accident but suffer no actual damages, should you be granted standing to sue either of the drivers?

ALSO, there are no issues of standing on the criminal justice side of the judicial system. ANY prosecuting attorney in the nation could initiate a Grand Jury investigation of Obama for election fraud, forgery, or altering documents.
With Grand Juries come the ability to subpoena documents and to compel witnesses to testify under oath.
Criminal Grand Jury investigations were utlized in Watergate, Iran-Contra, Whitewater, Paula Jones, and the CIA Leak-Valeria Plame affair. Obama’s buddy Rod Blagojevich was impeached and removed and convicted due to indictments issued by a federal grand jury in Illinois.
And Blagojevich was impeached by a Democrat majority in the state legislature.
If Obama were to be indicted, he would be finished. Indictments don’t extend from civil lawsuits.


76 posted on 10/16/2010 10:45:16 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

But Nixon was a Republican!Democrats can’t be prosecuted for malfeasance,misfeasance,or just plain crimes.


I think Obama’s buddy Rod Blagojevich, the impeached, removed from office and convicted former Governor of Illinois would disagree with you.
A Grand Jury investigation that finds enough evidence of criminal activity to indict for election fraud is all that is needed.
Blagojevich was impeached by the Democrat controlled legislature in Illinois. If Obama was an indicted liability, the Democrats would dump him faster than you can say “Blagojevich!”


77 posted on 10/16/2010 10:55:55 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

A nation state.

Same religion, culture, and language.

And the last man standing is Asia.

Goodbye the western world....it was great to know you.

78 posted on 10/16/2010 10:58:33 AM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
The broken record of "no standing" is pure BS. A simple legal argument is all that is needed: These lawsuits are going about it the wrong way. Sue the state for failing to tally votes correctly as other votes are invalid due to an unqualified candidate. This diminishes our right to vote as our votes are competing against invalid, illegal ones.

The states are ultimately at fault here. It is their responsibility for upholding the supreme law of the land by ensuring all electors are legal. We don't vote for president. We are voting for electors.
79 posted on 10/16/2010 11:47:10 AM PDT by BocoLoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Oh my! Haitian born even!

Look at his face. He was nominated by Ozombie to his position December 24, 2009.

http://www.haitianinternet.com/articles.php/487


80 posted on 10/16/2010 12:00:12 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson