Skip to comments.
U.S. attorney: Nothing Americans can do about eligibility
WND ^
| October 14, 2010
| Bob Unruh
Posted on 10/15/2010 6:12:49 PM PDT by RobinMasters
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-152 next last
To: mlo
“The only remedy to remove a sitting President is impeachment.”
Historically, that is clearly not the case...
61
posted on
10/15/2010 9:07:41 PM PDT
by
babygene
(Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
To: RobinMasters
bunch of prevaricating losers
62
posted on
10/15/2010 9:49:19 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys)
To: omegadawn
Thanks
To: ilovesarah2012
To: NOBO2
His father Frank Marshall Davis. His mother could have been his grandma. Maybe Stanley claimed the baby to keep grandma her job at the bank.
To: ExTexasRedhead
But Nixon was a Republican!Democrats can’t be prosecuted for malfeasance,misfeasance,or just plain crimes.
66
posted on
10/15/2010 10:30:15 PM PDT
by
hoosierham
(Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
To: ConorMacNessa
Yeah, we were talking about that tonight.
67
posted on
10/15/2010 11:23:13 PM PDT
by
Eagles6
To: TigersEye
He looks strongly like both Stanley Ann Dunham and her father.
68
posted on
10/15/2010 11:48:47 PM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: jarofants
He looks almost like the grandfather, not at all like the grandmother.
69
posted on
10/15/2010 11:58:57 PM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: RobinMasters
It should be taken as Self-evident that the United States Constitution means absolutely nothing to protect the reserved rights of the people so long as the Federal Governments own hand picked employees in black robes are the final authority on enforcing and “interpreting” it.
To: GeronL
The old story of crabs in a bucket. Only here it is we the
people in place of the crabs. In the place of our poser
who wishes he was a natural born citizen—May the bird of paradise fly up his nose-an elephant caress him with his toes
May he know intimately the sailors curse for he is a mag a scag a bloody rag a slippery slimey slut—may his days be few and his office taken by another-I can’t say it any better.
71
posted on
10/16/2010 5:46:34 AM PDT
by
StonyBurk
(ring)
To: BigBobber
I think his Administration pretty much proves what todays mere politicians think of the Constitution they swear or affirm to support. The other JFK from Mass. (the first one) was Impeached as he drove by the book exchange— didn’t make much
difference as EEyore said.
72
posted on
10/16/2010 5:51:33 AM PDT
by
StonyBurk
(ring)
To: kabumpo
He looks like the stuff I flush away after eatin too many black beans.
73
posted on
10/16/2010 6:16:20 AM PDT
by
StonyBurk
(ring)
To: TigersEye
I heard that before,it’s possible that Dumham adopted obama and returned to Hawaii and registered his birth. Regardless of how he was born or where ,obama is not a natural born citizens and is not the President of the U.S..
74
posted on
10/16/2010 7:10:10 AM PDT
by
omegadawn
(qualified)
To: StonyBurk
75
posted on
10/16/2010 9:28:09 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: TigersEye
Instead of telling us who doesnt have standing perhaps these experts could tell us who does.
John McCain would have standing. Sarah Palin would have standing and the Republican National Committee on behalf of McCain-Palin would have standing.
However none of those parties chose to file suit, enter an existing suit as a co-plaintiff or even file an amicus brief in support of any of the Obama eligibility lawsuits that have been filed.
US District Court Judge David O Carter contemplated granting standing to Alan Keyes but decided against it on the grounds that Keyes had no chance of election since he was only on the ballot in three states.
McCain and Palin could show direct and immediate injury from the election of an ineligible Barack Obama since they were the only other persons to actually receive electoral college votes.
Think of standing like this: if there is a two car automobile accident and you are an observer of the accident but suffer no actual damages, should you be granted standing to sue either of the drivers?
ALSO, there are no issues of standing on the criminal justice side of the judicial system. ANY prosecuting attorney in the nation could initiate a Grand Jury investigation of Obama for election fraud, forgery, or altering documents.
With Grand Juries come the ability to subpoena documents and to compel witnesses to testify under oath.
Criminal Grand Jury investigations were utlized in Watergate, Iran-Contra, Whitewater, Paula Jones, and the CIA Leak-Valeria Plame affair. Obama’s buddy Rod Blagojevich was impeached and removed and convicted due to indictments issued by a federal grand jury in Illinois.
And Blagojevich was impeached by a Democrat majority in the state legislature.
If Obama were to be indicted, he would be finished. Indictments don’t extend from civil lawsuits.
To: hoosierham
But Nixon was a Republican!Democrats cant be prosecuted for malfeasance,misfeasance,or just plain crimes.
I think Obama’s buddy Rod Blagojevich, the impeached, removed from office and convicted former Governor of Illinois would disagree with you.
A Grand Jury investigation that finds enough evidence of criminal activity to indict for election fraud is all that is needed.
Blagojevich was impeached by the Democrat controlled legislature in Illinois. If Obama was an indicted liability, the Democrats would dump him faster than you can say “Blagojevich!”
A nation state.
Same religion, culture, and language.
And the last man standing is Asia.
Goodbye the western world....it was great to know you.
To: RobinMasters
The broken record of "no standing" is pure BS. A simple legal argument is all that is needed:
- Presidents are elected by electors
- States have mandated that electors are chosen by who has the most votes in a general election
- One vote can swing the selection of the electors from one candidate's electors to another
- As such, the tie-breaker has standing if voter fraud is in play - if this vote is not tallied correctly, your right to vote is compromised
- Due to privacy and protection statutes, the tie-breaker can not be revealed
- Therefore anyone in the general election can be considered to be a tie breaker
- Ultimately everyone has standing because every vote counts at the state level
These lawsuits are going about it the wrong way. Sue the state for failing to tally votes correctly as other votes are invalid due to an unqualified candidate. This diminishes our right to vote as our votes are competing against invalid, illegal ones.
The states are ultimately at fault here. It is their responsibility for upholding the supreme law of the land by ensuring all electors are legal. We don't vote for president. We are voting for electors.
79
posted on
10/16/2010 11:47:10 AM PDT
by
BocoLoco
To: RobinMasters
80
posted on
10/16/2010 12:00:12 PM PDT
by
TruthConquers
(Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson