The idea that Dick Cheney could overturn the result of a presidential election by not verbally asking for written objections is pretty hilarious. It would mean that tbe Vice President has an absolute veto over who is elected president. It just goes to show the lengths to which a political obsession can take you.
If Obama can say FU to this entire nation by refusing to show what he’s hiding in his fist behind his back, then why the heck shouldn’t Cheney be able to do the same thing?
Two can play this game. Obama is a coward. Cheney has balls.
Two can play that game, and they did.
If you don’t like what Cheney did, - if you want him to complete the legal requirements so the process can happen as the Constitution and laws prescribe - then why don’t you just try to sue him? Like Kerchner did. That’s your legal recourse. You can’t just take the law into your own hands.
Why have you not gotten ONE GRAND JURY to force Cheney to ask the question so the laws can be followed? Why hasn’t ONE GRAND JURY taken up the issue and forced him to do it?
Kerchner filed his case; it’s still in process. The election has never been certified just like Obama’s eligibility has never been proven.
If you don’t want one person to be able to hijack the system, then maybe you should think twice about what Obama has been doing for the last 2 years.