You said the transfer was “readable” now it’s the line from the bottom of the receipt only. Such utter crap.
You are lying now or were lying then. Because you are a liar and I see through it.
It’s going to take the backs of both documents, the inside of the envelope and the back of the COLB. With clarity. And preferably scans IN ADDITION to photos. And today—not three weeks later like it took after she ‘received’ this photocopy.
This story SMELLS BAD.
“It was a straight front to back transfer of the some of the receipt onto the back of the
Now that I think about it a bit more, it was only the heavy ink (ink! IIINNNNkKKKkkk!!!) from the last line of the receipt onto the bottom of the long form. From that, without trying to study things in depth, I’d probably have to say that this transfer happened while the documents were folded together and in the envelope. But that is speculation ion my part. The point I wanted to make was that this wasn’t something she had just printed off.
B, either Danae has a moral bank account with you and you believe her, or you don’t.
If she shared this transfer image with you, assuming it came through clearly in a scan or photograph, would that be sufficient?
If so, why would that be enough if what she has shown you already isn’t enough?
If not, why should she bother and what level of evidence would you need?”
I tell you what smells bad ... the fact that a liberal is allowed to call freepers liars. Any liberal posting at FR should mind her manners and have polite discussion.
If birthers and anti-birthers have heated discussions, that's fine. We're all freepers interested in promoting conservative issues.
You shouldn't even be a freeper. You're a liberal. Get lost.
El Sordo, you’re saying it was the dark straight line at the bottom of the receipt and it was transferred onto the bottom of the back of the BC copy? Or was it the print above the solid line, or what?