Yet another assumption: all the datestamps should be exactly alike.
It's not just the day portion of her datestamp that is smaller. The whole stamp is smaller, which could be a result of how the document itself was photographed, scanned, imported, stored, etc. If it's an image of a datestamp, then there are logical explanations for differences in size.
In the very bottom example that you provide, try enlarging the whole datestamp so that the year portions are exactly the same size. I bet the day portion then looks more as you would expect.
You’re insane. Just the copying of Danae’s stamp has altered it to this degree.
You’re crazy dude. Get help.
I made no assumptions other than it looked different. Kiss my butt.
I realize that I’m coming late to this discussion. About the “date stamps” looking different: We are talking about photocopies or scans of older objects, aren’t we?
If these are supposed to be true “date stamps” meaning somebody used one of those old stampers with the rolling numbers and an ink pad, then any two documents might look different depending upon the make and model and how many of each any particular office had. Those things did wear out over time, so documents produced at different times would not be expected to be exactly the same, with regard to the stamps. There’s also a problem with sample size. I look at all of those date stamps and see no particular differences among any of them.
“Why do Danae’s date stamps look so different?”
Do they?
If the answer is yes, then what are ALL possible explanations? What motivation would there be for THIS person, in particular, to fake her COLB, given that in this instance she’s proven that Obama’s people aren’t truthful when they say that nobody can get an original long-form anymore? Wouldn’t that be acting against interest?
Buckeye, I’m not addressing this to you in particular. Yours was just the comment that made me want to weigh in. I’m an old info-systems person, too. Old in both respects.
As someone who has owned SEVERAL malfunctioning laser printers, I can state that they do transfer print from one page to another, sometimes after they’re “dry”, sometimes sticking together at only one location. I can’t explain the chemistry of it, but it does happen.
Who hasn’t received in the mail papers that are sticking together because the “ink” wasn’t “dry” or somehow got “wet” again in transit?
It’s possible that the papers were sitting on a desk somewhere, waiting for somebody to put them into the envelope. It’s also possible that they were folded wrong, the address didn’t show through, so the folder took the pages out and bent the receipt to make that part show through the window. Isn’t it?
If one wants to conduct a scientific analysis, then first certain FACTS need to be known: What type of equipment was used to produce each and every document under analysis? What’s the point of arguing without the most basic of facts?
What’s the point of analyzing to this degree Danae’s most recent document? Who’s invested in proving it false? Why? Motivation is an important part of this analysis. Or is it all just distraction?
My opinion, not addressed to anyone in particular, just a general plea: I can understand pointing out things that SEEM to not make sense. I can’t understand personally attacking those with whom one disagrees. Ask for clarification. Questioning someone else’s integrity should be out of order, unless the person is OBVIOUSLY not debating honestly. El Sordo, imho, is a stand up guy, even if I don’t agree with him all the time, politically speaking.
I’m with butterdezillion: I’m getting tired of all the in-fighting and having to choose between fellow freepers and being forced to ponder who’s for real and who’s not. btw, I haven’t finished reading this entire thread yet, so bear with me if I say something others have said already.