Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/13/2010 7:18:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
You oppose the Liberal Agenda? Well, you don't have standing.

You still oppose the Liberal Agenda? And you actually won a court case? Well, there will be appeals, of course. It may be years before anyone can tell if your victory is a victory. Most likely, somewhere along the way, you will lose and that will be that.

You support the Liberal agenda? And you won a court case? Well, that's it. It's settled. Law of the land, now and forever. No need to talk about it any more. We won.

2 posted on 10/13/2010 7:23:03 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

How to judge this? Does Virginia Phillips like carpet?


3 posted on 10/13/2010 7:25:08 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

With judges, why do we need a Congress, President or Constitution?


4 posted on 10/13/2010 7:26:19 AM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

IF a Federal Judge is allowed to make such decisions...Where does it stop? If Congress declares war and some federal judge doesn’t like it...If the EPA decides to mandate CAFE standards for tanks and some judge finds a low mpg tank in his/her jurisdiction can they make the whole Army switch to Prius tanks?

This is just so far out of line...

If gays want to make change - or anybody - there is a process and it needs to be followed. Otherwise we no longer have the Rule of Law. We have mob rule, we have anarchy, we have tyranny, or something other than the Constitutional Republic our forefathers left us.

It’s time like these when I look at the ‘good behavior’ clause in the constitution and think that judges who do this should be immediately disbarred and removed from their bench. If the President (hahahah) or the Congress want to limit the damage done by the courts, there is the power to disband them, limit their jurisdictions, remove judges and to maintain the sanctity of the Constitution and the Rule of Law. When I see this and I see no action being taken, I see this kind of abnegation of their responsibity as an acceptance of this kind of tyranny.

It cannot be accepted.


5 posted on 10/13/2010 7:26:34 AM PDT by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Based upon what I have seen in the last 10 years a judge or congressman, senator, president and even the traitors on the USSC CAN do anything they want.

Hell even Pete Stark admitted they can do anything.

We have let the communist progressives take over this country, our media, our universities, our PUBIC** schools without firing a shot.

We have no functioning Constitution as scum of the earth lawyers have decided to rule on case law rather than the original intent. Well if case law was what the founder intended to change the constitution then why the hell did they include the amendment process? I have yet to have ANY commie liberal be able to answer that question.

**(I spell it that way because they are more concerned with sex ed than education)


8 posted on 10/13/2010 7:33:30 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Judicial tyranny is killing the Republic. I realize that makes liberals dance with joy, but Americans actually prefer our continued existence.


9 posted on 10/13/2010 7:33:56 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
She's a Clinton suck.

In 1995, Phillips became a United States magistrate judge for the Central District of California. On January 26, 1999, Phillips was nominated by President Bill Clinton to be a district judge for the Central District, a seat vacated by William M. Byrne, Jr. She was confirmed by the United States Senate on November 10, 1999, and received her commission on November 15, 1999.

11 posted on 10/13/2010 7:39:09 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Judiciary bookmark.


14 posted on 10/13/2010 7:59:28 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Does a judge have the authority to ban 'Don't Ask Don't Tell'?

No.

Just because the Founders believed 'All Men are Created equal' doesn't mean they gave the government the authority to keep them that way.

15 posted on 10/13/2010 8:00:05 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Law of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s amazing what people with no authority say and expect people to buy into it,liberals and law never mix.


18 posted on 10/13/2010 9:56:35 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson